New JerseyPleasantville

Our Ladys Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare

1100 Clematis Ave, Pleasantville, NJ 08232 · Atlantic County · 214 certified beds · avg 182 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967

Part of chain: CENTER MANAGEMENT GROUP (16 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.22
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (26)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Dec 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Dec 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Dec 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Dec 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Dec 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule.
Dec 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 22, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 22, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Nov 22, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Nov 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Nov 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Nov 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Nov 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Nov 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 9, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Feb 9, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Feb 9, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Feb 9, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 9, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 9, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its staff were vaccinated for COVID-19 in accordance with the federal requirements in effect at the time.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202280E
2023100F
202480E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Jersey avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.223.883.95bottom 18% in New Jersey; bottom 23% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.580.670.69top 48% in New Jersey; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.883.533.50bottom 15% in New Jersey; bottom 25% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.350.500.48bottom 41% in New Jersey; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)33.839.745.8top 33% in New Jersey; top 21% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)20.037.742.9top 15% in New Jersey; top 13% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.43, RN 0.61, weekend 3.07. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Boehm, CarolineIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2015
Gros, Charles-EdouardIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2015
Pleasantville Ventures LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%12/01/2015
Babroff, SherriIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2015
Babroff, SherriIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2015
Babroff, SherriIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2015
Boehm, CarolineIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2015
Delaney, DianeIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/14/2025
Delaney, DianeIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/14/2025
Delaney, DianeIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/14/2025
Flancia, MariaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/17/2022
Flancia, MariaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/17/2022
Greystone Funding Company LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2020
Gros, Charles-EdouardIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2015
Klein, BaruchIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2015
Klein, BaruchIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2015
Levi, ShlomoIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Levi, ShlomoIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Levi, ShlomoIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Pleasantville Ventures LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2015

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Meadowview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center0.8 miNorthfield, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
Excel Care at Egg Harbor2.2 miEgg Harbor Township, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Complete Care at Linwood, LLC3.7 miLinwood, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
Preferred Care at Absecon4.6 miAbsecon, NJ★★★★★4/5
Excel Care at the Pines6.2 miAtlantic City, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
Atlas Healthcare at Seashore Gardens6.6 miGalloway Township, NJ★★★☆☆2/5
Health Center at Galloway, the6.7 miGalloway Township, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
Royal Suites Health Care & Rehabilitation6.7 miGalloway Township, NJ★★★★☆4/5
United Methodist Communities at the Shores8.6 miOcean City, NJ★★★★☆4/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Oceanview15.8 miOcean View, NJ★★★☆☆3/5
Seacrest Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center15.8 miLittle Egg Harbor TW, NJ★★★☆☆2/5
Mystic Meadows Rehabilitation and Nursing Center19.3 miLittle Egg Harbor TW, NJ★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Pleasantville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315054.