New JerseyPt Pleasant

Crest Pointe Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center

1515 Hulse Road, Pt Pleasant, NJ 08742 · Ocean County · 118 certified beds · avg 103 residents/day · certified since Mar 31, 1972

Part of chain: MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES (87 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$164,717
Fines, last 3 years
3.29
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Jun 12, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Jul 5, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Jun 12, 2024 · F-0835 · triggered by a complaint

The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.

Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Jul 5, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Nov 18, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 18, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Nov 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Nov 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Mar 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Jun 12, 2024▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jun 12, 2024▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint
Jun 12, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides were properly trained — aides working more than 4 months must be trained and competent, and newer aides must be enrolled in training.
Jun 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jun 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jun 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jun 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jun 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
May 11, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
May 11, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
May 11, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
May 11, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
May 11, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
May 11, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
May 11, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 11, 2022C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202280E
202492K ▲
202560F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $164,717.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jun 12, 2024Fine$164,717

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Jersey avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.293.883.95bottom 23% in New Jersey; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.460.670.69bottom 32% in New Jersey; bottom 31% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.053.533.50bottom 28% in New Jersey; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.360.500.48bottom 44% in New Jersey; bottom 45% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)34.239.745.8top 36% in New Jersey; top 22% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)26.737.742.9top 31% in New Jersey; top 24% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.05, RN 0.42, weekend 2.84. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Crest Pointe Partner LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%03/14/2019
Quinto Guardian LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest03/14/2019
Yr 2013 Investment Tr Ua 03252013Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest03/14/2019
Cibc Bank USAOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/14/2019
Crest Pointe Partner LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/04/2019
Crest Pointe Property LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/14/2019
Flagler, OsherIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/07/2025
Harman, DinaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Harman, DinaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/14/2019
Kahanow, AvivaIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/07/2025
Kohn, SaraIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/07/2025
Kohn, SeanIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/07/2025
Kumar, SanjayIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/14/2019
Kumar, SanjayIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/14/2019
Marquis Limited LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/14/2019
Marquis Limited LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/21/2025
Nutraco LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/14/2019
Nutraco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/21/2025
Posen, MindeeIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/14/2019
Posen, MindeeIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/14/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Complete Care at Brick LLC3.6 miBrick, NJ★★★☆☆3/5
Willow Springs Rehabilitation and Healthcare Cente3.9 miBrick, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Complete Care at Laurelton, LLC3.9 miBrick, NJ★★★☆☆3/5
Sunnyside Manor4.7 miWall, NJ★★★★★4/5
Preferred Care at Wall5.7 miAllenwood, NJ★★★★★4/5
Complete Care at Wall LLC6.2 miWall, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5
Complete Care at Shorrock6.3 miBrick, NJ★★★★★4/5
Concord Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center6.3 miLakewood, NJ★★★★★4/5
Careone at Wall6.6 miWall, NJ★★★★★4/5
Tower Lodge Care Center7.9 miWall, NJ★★★★★4/5
Harrogate Village8.2 miLakewood, NJ★★★★★4/5
Atlantic Coast Rehab & Health8.3 miLakewood, NJ★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Pt Pleasant →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315135.