New JerseyWall

Careone at Wall

2621 Highway 138, Wall, NJ 07719 · Monmouth County · 130 certified beds · avg 106 residents/day · certified since Sep 10, 2004

Part of chain: CAREONE (37 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$68,819
Fines, last 3 years
3.70
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 17, 2023 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Nov 30, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 25, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 25, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jan 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Jan 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Jan 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Oct 18, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Oct 17, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 17, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Oct 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Oct 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Oct 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Oct 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Oct 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Oct 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Oct 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Oct 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Oct 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Oct 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop, carry out, or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (2 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023141J ▲
202420F
202650D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $68,819.

DateTypeAmount / length
Oct 17, 2023Fine$68,819

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Jersey avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.703.883.95top 47% in New Jersey; bottom 47% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.890.670.69top 18% in New Jersey; top 21% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.243.533.50bottom 46% in New Jersey; bottom 44% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.750.500.48top 14% in New Jersey; top 14% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)28.239.745.8top 20% in New Jersey; top 11% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)13.337.742.9top 7% in New Jersey; top 7% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.09, RN 0.99, weekend 3.59. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Care One LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%04/01/2007
Des 2009 GST TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest18%07/30/2018
Des Holding Co., INC.Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest24%12/16/2007
Des-C 2009 GratOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest21%10/26/2009
Straus, DanielIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest38%04/21/2007
Baruch, DavidIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2021
Baruch, DavidIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2021
Care One Management, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2007
Healthbridge Management LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/25/2008

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Complete Care at Wall LLC0.5 miWall, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5
Tower Lodge Care Center1.4 miWall, NJ★★★★★4/5
Sunnyside Manor2.3 miWall, NJ★★★★★4/5
Jersey Shore Post Acute Rehabilitation and Nursing2.6 miNeptune, NJ★★★☆☆3/5
Coral Harbor Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center2.8 miNeptune City, NJ★★★★☆3/5
King Manor Care and Rehabilitation Center3.5 miNeptune, NJ★★★★☆4/5
Imperial Care Center3.6 miNeptune, NJ★★★★☆4/5
Continuing Care at Seabrook3.7 miTinton Falls, NJ★★★★★5/5
Complete Care at Ocean Grove LLC3.8 miOcean Grove, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
Preferred Care at Wall3.9 miAllenwood, NJ★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Wall →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315485.