New JerseyBrick

Willow Springs Rehabilitation and Healthcare Cente

1049 Burnt Tavern Road, Brick, NJ 08724 · Ocean County · 164 certified beds · avg 151 residents/day · certified since Jan 18, 1985

Part of chain: MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES (87 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$8,512
Fines, last 3 years
3.23
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jul 12, 2024 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 29, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (26)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 8, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 8, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Jul 12, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jul 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jul 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jul 12, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Jul 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Jul 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
Jul 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Jul 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Nov 3, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Dec 20, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 20, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Dec 20, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 20, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 20, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its staff were vaccinated for COVID-19 in accordance with the federal requirements in effect at the time.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 11).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202250E
202310B
202491G ▲
2026110F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,512.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jul 5, 2024Fine$8,512

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Jersey avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.233.883.95bottom 19% in New Jersey; bottom 23% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.600.670.69top 45% in New Jersey; top 49% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.813.533.50bottom 10% in New Jersey; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.330.500.48bottom 38% in New Jersey; bottom 39% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)34.839.745.8top 37% in New Jersey; top 24% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)31.337.742.9top 38% in New Jersey; top 32% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.16, RN 0.58, weekend 2.75. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Cibc Bank USAOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2014
Kohn Fam Tr GST Exempt Uad 3-25-13OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Marquis Limited LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Marquis Limited LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/13/2025
NFR 2020 Irrv TrOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Posen, MindeeIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Posen, MindeeIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Pramnauth, OmkarIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2025
Pramnauth, OmkarIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2025
Pramnauth, OmkarIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2025
Pramnauth, OmkarIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2025
Quinto Guardian LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/14/2019
Reliant Pro Rehab LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/13/2017
Reliant Pro Rehab LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/13/2025
Rosenblum, EliyahuIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2023
Rosenblum, EliyahuIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2023
Rothberg, MichaelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2022
Rothberg, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2022
Rsbrmk Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
SK 2013 Investment Tr Ua 03252013OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Complete Care at Laurelton, LLC1.0 miBrick, NJ★★★☆☆3/5
Complete Care at Brick LLC1.2 miBrick, NJ★★★☆☆3/5
Concord Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center2.6 miLakewood, NJ★★★★★4/5
Preferred Care at Wall3.1 miAllenwood, NJ★★★★★4/5
Crest Pointe Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center3.9 miPt Pleasant, NJ★☆☆☆☆1/5
Sunnyside Manor4.0 miWall, NJ★★★★★4/5
Atlantic Coast Rehab & Health4.8 miLakewood, NJ★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Fountainview Care Center4.8 miLakewood, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Complete Care at Shorrock4.9 miBrick, NJ★★★★★4/5
Leisure Chateau Rehabilitation5.3 miLakewood, NJ★★★★★4/5
Harrogate Village5.3 miLakewood, NJ★★★★★4/5
Complete Care at Wall LLC5.8 miWall, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Brick →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315213.