New JerseyLakewood

Atlantic Coast Rehab & Health

485 River Ave, Lakewood, NJ 08701 · Ocean County · 160 certified beds · avg 128 residents/day · certified since Mar 27, 1979

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: OCEAN HEALTHCARE (11 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$101,112
Fines, last 3 years
3.59
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 11, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Apr 28, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (20)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 11, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Mar 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Feb 14, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 14, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 11, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jan 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Jan 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Jan 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 11, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Dec 11, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Dec 11, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 10).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202020D
202360E
2025100E
202621J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $101,112.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 11, 2026Fine$101,112

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Jersey avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.593.883.95bottom 45% in New Jersey; bottom 41% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.400.670.69bottom 23% in New Jersey; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.293.533.50bottom 49% in New Jersey; bottom 47% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.240.500.48bottom 17% in New Jersey; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)35.739.745.8top 39% in New Jersey; top 26% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)35.737.742.9top 48% in New Jersey; top 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.13, RN 0.35, weekend 2.87. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Feigenbaum, DeborahIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/10/2003
Maierovits, AvrohomIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/15/2004
Amboy National BankOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2005
Dynamic Healthcare Management LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2008
Dynamic Healthcare Management LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/09/2025
Feigenbaum, DeborahIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2008
Feigenbaum, MelvinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/30/1997
Feigenbaum, MelvinIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/30/1997
Goldstein, YochananIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/26/2022
Goldstein, YochananIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/26/2022
Maierovits, AvrohomIndividualLimited Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/15/2004
Maierovits, AvrohomIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/15/2004

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Fountainview Care Center0.0 miLakewood, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Leisure Chateau Rehabilitation1.1 miLakewood, NJ★★★★★4/5
Harrogate Village2.1 miLakewood, NJ★★★★★4/5
Concord Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center2.1 miLakewood, NJ★★★★★4/5
Shore Gardens Rehabilitation and Nursing Center3.2 miToms River, NJ★☆☆☆☆1/5
Complete Care at Green Acres3.6 miToms River, NJ★★★★★5/5
Complete Care at Laurelton, LLC4.4 miBrick, NJ★★★☆☆3/5
Hampton Ridge Healthcare and Rehabilitation4.5 miToms River, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Childrens Specialized Hospital Toms River4.5 miToms River, NJ★★★★★4/5
Complete Care at Shorrock4.5 miBrick, NJ★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lakewood →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315115.