New JerseyLawrenceville

Lawrence Rehabilitation Hospital

2381 Lawrenceville Road, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648 · Mercer County · 56 certified beds · avg 54 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 1971

Part of chain: MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES (87 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.21
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (38)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 30, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jan 30, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility was not properly licensed, or did not operate in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and accepted professional standards.
Jan 30, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them.
Jan 30, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Jan 30, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Jan 30, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Jan 30, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Jan 30, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Jan 30, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 30, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jan 30, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jan 30, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jan 30, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jan 30, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Jan 30, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jan 30, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Jan 30, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 30, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Jan 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility required residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits or pay privately as a condition of moving in, or failed to tell residents which types of care it does not provide. Both practices are against the rules.
Jan 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely.
Jan 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jan 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Sep 6, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them.
Sep 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Sep 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jun 2, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Jun 2, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jun 2, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jun 2, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Jun 2, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility was not properly licensed, or did not operate in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and accepted professional standards.
Jun 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jun 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jun 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 2, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 23).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023100E
202450F
2026230F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Jersey avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.213.883.95bottom 16% in New Jersey; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.690.670.69top 33% in New Jersey; top 37% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.803.533.50bottom 9% in New Jersey; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.510.500.48top 34% in New Jersey; top 32% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)37.039.745.8top 43% in New Jersey; top 29% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)46.737.742.9bottom 29% in New Jersey; bottom 41% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.65, RN 1.01, weekend 4.06. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Flagler, OsherIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/18/2025
Harman, DinaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Harman, DinaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Jain, MadhuIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Jain, MadhuIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Kahanow, AvivaIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/18/2025
Lawrence Real Property LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Levovitz, TzviIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/18/2025
Marquis Limited LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Marquis Limited LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
NFR 2020 Irrv TrOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Nutraco LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Nutraco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
Onyenemezu, JenelleIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Onyenemezu, JenelleIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Posen, MindeeIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Posen, MindeeIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Quinto Nexgen LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Rokeach, FraideIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/18/2025
Rokowsky, YitzchokIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/18/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Lawrence Rehab & Hcc/The Meadows at Lawrence0.2 miLawrenceville, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
Clover Meadows Healthcare and Rehabilitation Cente1.0 miLawrenceville, NJ★★★★★4/5
Avant Rehabilitation and Care Center3.2 miTrenton, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Preferred Care at Mercer4.0 miEwing, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Greenwood House Home for the Jewish Aged4.0 miTrenton, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5
Hamilton Grove Healthcare and Rehabilitation, LLC4.4 miHamilton, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
Belle Care Nursing and Rehabilitation Center4.7 miTrenton, NJ★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Avalon Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center4.8 miHamilton, NJ★☆☆☆☆1/5
Complete Care at Mercerville LLC4.9 miHamilton Township, NJ★★★★★4/5
Trenton Gardens Rehabilitation and Nursing Center5.8 miTrenton, NJ—/5SFF
Preferred Care at Hamilton5.9 miHamilton Square, NJ★★★★★4/5
Accela Post Acute Care at Hamilton5.9 miHamilton, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lawrenceville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315127.