New JerseyOakland

Oakland Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center

20 Breakneck Road, Oakland, NJ 07436 · Bergen County · 215 certified beds · avg 201 residents/day · certified since Jan 7, 1980

Part of chain: MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES (87 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$28,444
Fines, last 3 years
3.86
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 3, 2023 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 4, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (32)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 30, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies.
May 30, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
May 30, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides were properly trained — aides working more than 4 months must be trained and competent, and newer aides must be enrolled in training.
May 30, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
May 30, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
May 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
May 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
May 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
May 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
May 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
May 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
May 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
May 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
May 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
May 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
May 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 29, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jan 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jan 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jan 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · from a complaint
Mar 3, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 3, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 3, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 3, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program.
Mar 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Mar 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Mar 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving.
Mar 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
Mar 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Mar 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Mar 26, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 17).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202110D
2023101G ▲
2025210F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $28,444.

DateTypeAmount / length
May 30, 2025Fine$28,444

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Jersey avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.863.883.95top 37% in New Jersey; top 46% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.490.670.69bottom 38% in New Jersey; bottom 37% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.563.533.50top 35% in New Jersey; top 39% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.320.500.48bottom 34% in New Jersey; bottom 36% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)44.139.745.8bottom 34% in New Jersey; top 48% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)52.037.742.9bottom 21% in New Jersey; bottom 32% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.53, RN 0.45, weekend 3.26. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Individual

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Marquis Guardian Limited LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest90%01/01/2018
NFR 2020 Irrv TrOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Rokeach, NachumIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest18%01/01/2022
Tryko Guardian Limited LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest68%01/01/2018
Ukr Limited LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest10%01/02/2019
Greystone Funding Company LLCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2015
Kersteer Limited LLCOrganizationLimited Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018
Marquis Limited LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Marquis Limited LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/09/2025
Monnecka, JeanIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/24/2023
Monnecka, JeanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/24/2023
Monnecka, JeanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/24/2023
Monnecka, JeanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/24/2023
Nutraco LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/27/2025
Nutraco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/09/2025
Oakland Care Center Real Estate Co LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2015
Posen, MindeeIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Posen, MindeeIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Reliant Pro Rehab LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/29/2020
Reliant Pro Rehab LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/09/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Arbor Ridge Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center1.5 miWayne, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5
Complete Care at Wayne Hills Rehab & Resp Center1.6 miWayne, NJ★☆☆☆☆1/5
Llanfair House Care & Rehabilitation Center2.2 miWayne, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
Phoenix Center for Rehabilitation and Pediatrics2.9 miHaskell, NJ★★★☆☆3/5
Lakeland Nursing & Rehab3.2 miHaskell, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Careone at Wayne3.3 miWayne, NJ★★★★★5/5
Health Center at Bloomingdale3.7 miBloomingdale, NJ★★★★★4/5
Windmere3.8 miNorth Haledon, NJ★★★★☆4/5
Avalon Rehab and Care Center3.9 miWayne, NJ★★★☆☆4/5
Atrium Post Acute Care of Wayne3.9 miWayne, NJ★★★★☆4/5
Christian Health Care Center4.0 miWyckoff, NJ★★★☆☆2/5
Excel Care at Wayne4.1 miWayne, NJ★☆☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Oakland →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315171.