How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
962 River Ave, Lakewood, NJ 08701 (opens Google Maps) · Ocean County · (732) 370-8600· 242 certified beds · avg 189 residents/day · certified since May 28, 1982 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 21 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. F-0578
The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. F-0582
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700 |
| Oct 11, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Oct 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · from a complaint · F-0803 |
| Oct 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| May 12, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| May 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| May 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| May 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| May 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| May 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| May 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| May 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| May 12, 2023 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 8).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 10 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 8 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.15 | 3.88 | 3.95 | top 25% in New Jersey; top 34% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.33 | 0.67 | 0.69 | bottom 10% in New Jersey; bottom 13% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.73 | 3.53 | 3.50 | top 28% in New Jersey; top 32% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.27 | 0.50 | 0.48 | bottom 22% in New Jersey; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 51.2 | 39.7 | 45.8 | bottom 20% in New Jersey; bottom 34% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 61.3 | 37.7 | 42.9 | bottom 11% in New Jersey; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.73, RN 0.30, weekend 3.35.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.73 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Leisure Chateau Rehabilitation. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brodt, Nechama | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2020 |
| Jr Family Holdings I LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2021 |
| Jr Family Trust I | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2021 |
| Leisure Chateau Acquisition LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/06/2005 |
| Rosenbaum, Joseph | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/06/2005 |
| Brodt, Nechama | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/06/2005 |
| Capital One Na | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/06/2013 |
| Jr Family Holdings I LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Jr Family Trust I | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Leisure Chateau Acquisition LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Leisure Chateau Acquisition LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/25/2025 |
| Lempel, Allen | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Lempel, Allen | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/25/2025 |
| Rosenbaum, Joseph | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/06/2005 |
| Rosenbaum, Joseph | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/06/2005 |
| Schwartz, Moshe | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Schwartz, Moshe | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/29/2025 |
All 17 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fountainview Care Center | 1.0 mi | Lakewood, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Atlantic Coast Rehab & Health | 1.1 mi | Lakewood, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Harrogate Village | 1.1 mi | Lakewood, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Shore Gardens Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 2.2 mi | Toms River, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Complete Care at Green Acres | 2.6 mi | Toms River, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Concord Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center | 2.8 mi | Lakewood, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Hampton Ridge Healthcare and Rehabilitation | 3.4 mi | Toms River, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Childrens Specialized Hospital Toms River | 3.4 mi | Toms River, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Complete Care at Shorrock | 3.9 mi | Brick, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Rose Garden Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 4.2 mi | Toms River, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Complete Care at Laurelton, LLC | 4.7 mi | Brick, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Complete Care at Brick LLC | 5.0 mi | Brick, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Ocean, NJ — 32 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315190.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details