Mount Holly Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center
62 Richmond Avenue, Lumberton, NJ 08048 · Burlington County · 180 certified beds · avg 161 residents/day · certified since Jun 16, 1971
Abuse citation flag (CMS)
Part of chain: MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES (87 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)
The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 20, 2023 · F-0808
The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.
Why it matters: A special diet handled without proper medical oversight may not be safe or right for the resident's condition.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Jun 27, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 7, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Mar 25, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 7, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Mar 25, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 20, 2023 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Jun 27, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 20, 2023 · F-0725
The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Why it matters: Understaffing means longer waits for help, missed care, and higher risk of falls and other harm.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Jun 27, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (32)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Feb 7, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Feb 7, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint |
| Feb 7, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Feb 7, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign. |
| Feb 7, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. |
| Feb 7, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint |
| Feb 7, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Feb 7, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. |
| Feb 7, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint |
| Feb 7, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint |
| Feb 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. |
| Feb 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Feb 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
| Feb 7, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint |
| Feb 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint |
| Feb 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint |
| May 20, 2023 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. |
| May 20, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| May 20, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. |
| May 20, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. |
| May 20, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. |
| May 20, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. |
| May 20, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. |
| May 20, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. |
| May 20, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| May 20, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. |
| May 20, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| May 20, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. |
| May 20, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| May 20, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. |
| May 12, 2021 | B · Minimal risk, repeated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (14 → 14).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 1 | 0 | B |
| 2023 | 14 | 3 | J ▲ |
| 2025 | 17 | 2 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.63 | 3.88 | 3.95 | bottom 48% in New Jersey; bottom 43% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.38 | 0.67 | 0.69 | bottom 19% in New Jersey; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.39 | 3.53 | 3.50 | top 46% in New Jersey; top 48% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.19 | 0.50 | 0.48 | bottom 11% in New Jersey; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 44.9 | 39.7 | 45.8 | bottom 32% in New Jersey; top 50% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 35.3 | 37.7 | 42.9 | top 46% in New Jersey; top 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.43, RN 0.36, weekend 3.20. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bauer, Gary | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/28/2022 |
| Bauer, Gary | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/28/2022 |
| Bollampally, Soumya | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/28/2022 |
| Bollampally, Soumya | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/28/2022 |
| Dallos, Timothy | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Dallos, Timothy | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Dallos, Timothy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Dallos, Timothy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Harman, Dina | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/28/2022 |
| Harman, Dina | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/28/2022 |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/28/2022 |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/13/2025 |
| Mount Holly Real Property LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/28/2022 |
| NFR 2020 Irrv Tr | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/28/2022 |
| Nutraco LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/12/2024 |
| Nutraco LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/13/2025 |
| Posen, Mindee | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/28/2022 |
| Posen, Mindee | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/28/2022 |
| Quinto Nexgen LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/28/2022 |
| Reliant Pro Rehab LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/28/2022 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Who oversees residents' therapeutic diets, and how do the doctor and dietitian work together on them?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What is your nurse and aide staffing ratio on each shift, including nights and weekends?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Is signing an arbitration agreement required for admission, and can we refuse it without affecting my family member's care?"
- "How do you inspect and maintain essential equipment, and how quickly are repairs made?"
- "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complete Care at Marcella | 4.7 mi | Burlington, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Complete Care at Burlington Woods, LLC | 5.1 mi | Burlington, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Masonic Village at Burlington | 5.5 mi | Burlington, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Aspen Hills Healthcare Center | 6.5 mi | Pemberton, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Total Rehab Moorestown | 6.5 mi | Moorestown, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Cambridge Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 7.3 mi | Moorestown, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Careone at Moorestown | 7.3 mi | Moorestown, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Willowbrooke Court Skilled Care at Evergreens | 7.7 mi | Moorestown, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Medford Leas | 8.6 mi | Medford, NJ | ★★★★★ | 3/5 | |
| Wiley Mission | 9.0 mi | Marlton, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bristol Health & Rehab Center | 9.1 mi | Bristol, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Pines at Medford | 9.4 mi | Medford, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315128.