2305 Rancocas Road, Burlington, NJ 08016 (opens Google Maps) · Burlington County · (609) 387-9300· 150 certified beds · avg 143 residents/day · certified since May 2, 1994 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: COMPLETE CARE (85 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · May 12, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 22, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint F-0760
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2026 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jul 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint · F-0760 |
| Jul 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 21, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Jun 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Nov 21, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 21, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Nov 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Nov 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint · F-0655 |
| Nov 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Nov 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Aug 11, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Aug 11, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Aug 11, 2021 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Aug 11, 2021 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · F-0638 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 7 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 1 | 1 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $62,666.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2026 | Fine | $62,666 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.59 | 3.88 | 3.95 | bottom 46% in New Jersey; bottom 41% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.39 | 0.67 | 0.69 | bottom 21% in New Jersey; bottom 21% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.16 | 3.53 | 3.50 | bottom 38% in New Jersey; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.20 | 0.50 | 0.48 | bottom 11% in New Jersey; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 36.3 | 39.7 | 45.8 | top 41% in New Jersey; top 27% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 20.0 | 37.7 | 42.9 | top 15% in New Jersey; top 13% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.57, RN 0.39, weekend 3.14.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.57 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Complete Care at Marcella. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC NJ1 Opcos LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 07/01/2021 |
| PC Wta Opco Holdco LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2021 |
| SMS 2021 Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2021 |
| Stein, Shalom | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Aurora Guardian Holdco II Co-Borrower, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Aurora Guardian Holdco II Mezz Borrower, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Aurora Guardian Holdco II, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Aurora Guardian II Realty, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Aurora Guardian Partners II LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Hepner-Elcheck, Lisa | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Hoch, Robert | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Hoch, Robert | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| J & R Family Investments, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Kaufman, Chaim | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Kaufman, Chaim | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| L Friedman 2018 Family Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| L Friedman Family Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Landau Family Investment Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| M Friedman 2018 Family Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Marcella Center Realty, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
Showing 20 of 34 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 14 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Complete Care — 85 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 84 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complete Care at Burlington Woods, LLC | 0.6 mi | Burlington, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Masonic Village at Burlington | 1.9 mi | Burlington, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Bristol Health & Rehab Center | 4.6 mi | Bristol, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Mount Holly Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center | 4.7 mi | Lumberton, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Careone at Moorestown | 5.8 mi | Moorestown, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Total Rehab Moorestown | 6.2 mi | Moorestown, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Willowbrooke Court Skilled Care at Evergreens | 6.4 mi | Moorestown, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Cambridge Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 6.8 mi | Moorestown, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| River's Edge Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center | 7.2 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Juniper Village at Bucks County Rehab and SKD Care | 7.6 mi | Bensalem, PA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Wynwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 7.8 mi | Cinnaminson, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Statesman Health & Rehabilitation Center | 8.8 mi | Levittown, PA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Burlington, NJ — 17 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315330.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details