New JerseyBurlington

Complete Care at Burlington Woods, LLC

115 Sunset Road, Burlington, NJ 08016 · Burlington County · 215 certified beds · avg 181 residents/day · certified since Dec 1, 1976

Part of chain: COMPLETE CARE (85 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$63,469
Fines, last 3 years
3.48
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 13, 2023 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jan 5, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 27, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jun 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Jun 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jun 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Dec 13, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 13, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 13, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Dec 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them.
Dec 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have firmly secured handrails on both sides of its hallways.
Dec 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Dec 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for residents with a colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy — surgical openings in the abdomen that let waste leave the body into a pouch. These require regular, skilled attention to stay clean and healthy. · from a complaint
Jul 29, 2021F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 29, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jul 29, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jul 29, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jul 29, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202150F
2023141G ▲
202530D
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $63,469.

DateTypeAmount / length
Dec 13, 2023Fine$63,469

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Jersey avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.483.883.95bottom 38% in New Jersey; bottom 36% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.400.670.69bottom 23% in New Jersey; bottom 23% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.203.533.50bottom 41% in New Jersey; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.360.500.48bottom 44% in New Jersey; bottom 45% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)41.739.745.8bottom 44% in New Jersey; top 41% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)37.537.742.9bottom 49% in New Jersey; top 42% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.56, RN 0.41, weekend 3.27. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
PC NJ1 Opcos LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%07/01/2021
PC Wta Opco Holdco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest07/01/2021
SMS 2021 TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest07/01/2021
Stein, ShalomIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Aurora Guardian Holdco II Co-Borrower, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Aurora Guardian Holdco II Mezz Borrower, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Aurora Guardian Holdco II, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Aurora Guardian II Realty, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Aurora Guardian Partners II LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Bevans, SakiaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Burlington Woods Realty, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Goldman, EliyahuIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Goldman, EliyahuIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Hoch, RobertIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Hoch, RobertIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
J & R Family Investments, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
L Friedman 2018 Family TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
L Friedman Family Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Landau Family Investment TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
M Friedman 2018 Family TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Complete Care at Marcella0.6 miBurlington, NJ★★★★★4/5
Masonic Village at Burlington1.3 miBurlington, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Bristol Health & Rehab Center4.1 miBristol, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Mount Holly Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center5.1 miLumberton, NJ★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Careone at Moorestown6.4 miMoorestown, NJ★★★☆☆3/5
Total Rehab Moorestown6.8 miMoorestown, NJ★★★☆☆2/5
Willowbrooke Court Skilled Care at Evergreens7.0 miMoorestown, NJ★★★★★5/5
Juniper Village at Bucks County Rehab and SKD Care7.3 miBensalem, PA★★★★★4/5
Cambridge Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center7.4 miMoorestown, NJ★★★☆☆2/5
River's Edge Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center7.4 miPhiladelphia, PA★★★★☆3/5
Wynwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center8.2 miCinnaminson, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5
Statesman Health & Rehabilitation Center8.3 miLevittown, PA★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Burlington →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315050.