How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
One Medford Leas Way, Medford, NJ 08055 (opens Google Maps) · Burlington County · (609) 654-3000· 24 certified beds · avg 9 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1973 · Medicare only — not Medicaid certified
Certified for Medicare only. Medicare pays for short rehabilitation stays, not for long-term care — and this facility cannot bill Medicaid, which is what most families rely on for a long stay. Ask what a long-term stay here would cost and how it would be paid for. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 8 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. F-0838
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 25, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Feb 25, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · F-0838 |
| Feb 25, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them. · F-0865 |
| Feb 25, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · F-0867 |
| Feb 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Jan 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 6).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 12.43 | 3.88 | 3.95 | top 1% in New Jersey; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 6.01 | 0.67 | 0.69 | top 1% in New Jersey; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 9.65 | 3.53 | 3.50 | top 1% in New Jersey; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 2.91 | 0.50 | 0.48 | top 2% in New Jersey; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 25.9 | 39.7 | 45.8 | top 16% in New Jersey; top 8% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 15.4 | 37.7 | 42.9 | top 9% in New Jersey; top 9% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 10.92, RN 5.28, weekend 8.48.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (10.92 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Medford Leas. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleaver, Richard | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/14/2025 |
| Damico, James | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/13/2019 |
| Damico, James | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/13/2019 |
| Jones, Scott | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/29/2020 |
| Kreider, Robert | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/14/2025 |
| Loftus, Abby | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/18/2015 |
| Morgan, Margaret | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/14/2025 |
| Symcak, Diane | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/29/2020 |
| Vickers, Jeremy | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/11/2010 |
| Vickers, Jeremy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/11/2010 |
| Vickers, Jeremy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2025 |
All 11 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Pines at Medford | 0.9 mi | Medford, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Wiley Mission | 5.4 mi | Marlton, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Complete Care at Voorhees, LLC | 6.2 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Complete Care at Kresson View, LLC | 6.8 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Careone at Evesham | 7.1 mi | Marlton, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Subacute at Autumn Lake Healthcare | 7.8 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| St Mary's Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare | 8.1 mi | Cherry Hill, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Echelon Care & Rehab | 8.2 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Voorhees Pediatric Facility | 8.2 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| The Fountains of Atco | 8.3 mi | Atco, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Lions Gate | 8.5 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Mount Holly Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center | 8.6 mi | Lumberton, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Burlington, NJ — 17 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315144.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details