New JerseyRiverton

Riverview Estates Rehab and Senior Living Center

303 Bank Ave, Riverton, NJ 08077 · Burlington County · 66 certified beds · avg 58 residents/day · certified since Mar 2, 1998

Part of chain: ALLAIRE HEALTH SERVICES (20 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$38,455
Fines, last 3 years
4.70
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide · Oct 30, 2023 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (L): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation existed throughout the facility. The single most serious citation CMS can issue.

Corrected: Dec 4, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 7, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Jan 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jan 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Jan 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Sep 6, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · from a complaint
Sep 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Sep 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Sep 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Sep 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 30, 2023▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, facility-wideThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 30, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 30, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Oct 30, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Oct 30, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Oct 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Oct 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Oct 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Oct 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023101L ▲
202470F
202640E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $38,455.

DateTypeAmount / length
Oct 30, 2023Fine$38,455

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Jersey avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.703.883.95top 13% in New Jersey; top 18% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.950.670.69top 15% in New Jersey; top 18% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.983.533.50top 19% in New Jersey; top 23% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.460.500.48top 40% in New Jersey; top 38% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)60.039.745.8bottom 5% in New Jersey; bottom 17% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)37.537.742.9bottom 49% in New Jersey; top 42% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.44, RN 0.90, weekend 3.76. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Kurland, BenjaminIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest99%06/01/2022
Riverview Estates Rehabilitation and Senior Living CenterOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%06/01/2022
Davis, MatthewIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Old Second National BankOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Old Second National BankOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Wynwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center1.9 miCinnaminson, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5
Immaculatemarycenter for Rehabilitation&healthcare3.0 miPhiladelphia, PA★☆☆☆☆2/5
River's Edge Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center3.1 miPhiladelphia, PA★★★★☆3/5
Transitional Care Unit at Nazareth Hospital3.3 miPhiladelphia, PA★★★★★4/5
Roosevelt Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center3.4 miPhiladelphia, PA★★☆☆☆2/5
Deer Meadows Rehabilitation Center3.5 miPhiladelphia, PA★★☆☆☆2/5
Wesley Enhanced Living Pennypack Park3.6 miPhiladelphia, PA★★★☆☆3/5
The Pines at Philadelphia Rehab and Healthcare Ctr3.6 miPhiladelphia, PA★★★★★4/5
Willowbrooke Court Skilled Care at Evergreens4.4 miMoorestown, NJ★★★★★5/5
Careone at Moorestown4.7 miMoorestown, NJ★★★☆☆3/5
Pennypack Rehab and Care Center4.8 miPhiladelphia, PA★★★★☆4/5
Palace Rehabilitation and Care Center, the5.0 miMaple Shade, NJ★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Riverton →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315448.