212 Marter Avenue, Moorestown, NJ 08057 (opens Google Maps) · Burlington County · (856) 291-4800· 124 certified beds · avg 124 residents/day · certified since Nov 10, 2014 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PREFERRED CARE (13 facilities, chain avg rating 3.7★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. F-0583
The facility was not properly licensed, or did not operate in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and accepted professional standards. F-0836
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Apr 17, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Apr 17, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility was not properly licensed, or did not operate in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and accepted professional standards. · F-0836 |
| Apr 17, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 17, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Apr 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Apr 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Apr 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Apr 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. · F-0808 |
| Apr 17, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Dec 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Dec 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Dec 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Dec 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 8, 2023 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility was not properly licensed, or did not operate in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and accepted professional standards. · F-0836 |
| Aug 23, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 9).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 10 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $25,090.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2025 | Fine | $25,090 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.96 | 3.88 | 3.95 | bottom 5% in New Jersey; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.69 | top 28% in New Jersey; top 31% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.64 | 3.53 | 3.50 | bottom 5% in New Jersey; bottom 14% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.87 | 0.50 | 0.48 | top 9% in New Jersey; top 9% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 50.6 | 39.7 | 45.8 | bottom 22% in New Jersey; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 48.8 | 37.7 | 42.9 | bottom 26% in New Jersey; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.57, RN 1.16, weekend 4.08.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.57 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Total Rehab Moorestown. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Green, Dov | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 50% | 01/08/2024 |
| Mermelstein, Boruch | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 50% | 01/08/2024 |
| Moorestown Operator Holdco LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 01/08/2024 |
| Landau, Meir | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/08/2024 |
| Stern, Samuel | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/08/2024 |
All 5 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Preferred Care — 13 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 12 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cambridge Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 0.8 mi | Moorestown, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Careone at Moorestown | 1.6 mi | Moorestown, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Willowbrooke Court Skilled Care at Evergreens | 1.7 mi | Moorestown, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Laurel Brook Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 4.0 mi | Mount Laurel, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Wynwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 4.2 mi | Cinnaminson, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Palace Rehabilitation and Care Center, the | 4.6 mi | Maple Shade, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Dwellside Care and Rehab | 5.3 mi | Cherry Hill, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Careone at Evesham | 5.3 mi | Marlton, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Barclays Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 5.6 mi | Cherry Hill, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Wiley Mission | 5.7 mi | Marlton, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Premier Cadbury of Cherry Hill | 5.8 mi | Cherry Hill, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Riverview Estates Rehab and Senior Living Center | 6.0 mi | Riverton, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Burlington, NJ — 17 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315517.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details