How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Complete Care at Plainfield LLC
1340 Park Ave, Plainfield, NJ 07060 (opens Google Maps) · Union County · (908) 754-3100· 106 certified beds · avg 103 residents/day · certified since Aug 1, 1976 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: COMPLETE CARE (85 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Mar 20, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Feb 17, 2023
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.27
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 17, 2023 · F-0692
The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 17, 2023 · F-0692
The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Why it matters: Malnutrition and dehydration can quickly weaken a resident and lead to serious complications.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 17, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 8 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. F-0692
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. F-0658
View all 8 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 17, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Feb 17, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Feb 17, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility admitted a resident without a doctor's order, or did not make sure each resident stayed under a doctor's ongoing care. · F-0710 |
| Feb 17, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| Feb 17, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Feb 19, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 19, 2021 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule. · F-0712 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 1).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2025
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 5 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew Jersey averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.27
New Jersey average: 3.88
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.61
New Jersey average: 0.67
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.91
New Jersey average: 3.53
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.27 | 3.88 | 3.95 | bottom 21% in New Jersey; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.61 | 0.67 | 0.69 | top 43% in New Jersey; top 47% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.91 | 3.53 | 3.50 | bottom 17% in New Jersey; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.38 | 0.50 | 0.48 | bottom 48% in New Jersey; bottom 48% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 30.4 | 39.7 | 45.8 | top 26% in New Jersey; top 15% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 38.5 | 37.7 | 42.9 | bottom 45% in New Jersey; top 44% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.07, RN 0.57, weekend 2.73.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.07 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Complete Care at Plainfield LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC HMH Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 03/16/2023 |
| PC HMH Opco Holdngs LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 03/16/2023 |
| SMS 2021 Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 03/16/2023 |
| Stein, Shalom | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Eef Capital LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Friedman, Benjamin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/22/2024 |
| Friedman, Benjamin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/22/2024 |
| Grewal, Baljinder | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Grewal, Baljinder | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Hassan, Syed | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Hassan, Syed | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Levovitz, Yitzchok | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Levovitz, Yitzchok | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Mercado, Wanda | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| PC HMH Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| PC HMH Propco Intermediate 9 LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| PC HMH Topco Propco Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Peace Capital Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Plainfield Propco Holdco LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Plainfield Propco LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
Showing 20 of 28 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 8 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Complete Care — 85 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Complete Care at Prospect Heights LLC — Hackensack, NJ · overall 2/5
- Complete Care at Regent LLC — Hackensack, NJ · overall 2/5
- Complete Care at Shorrock — Brick, NJ · overall 5/5
- Complete Care at Shrewsbury LLC — Shrewsbury, NJ · overall 3/5
- Complete Care at St Vincents LLC — Cedar Grove, NJ · overall 5/5
- Complete Care at Summit Ridge — West Orange, NJ · overall 4/5
- Complete Care at Voorhees, LLC — Voorhees, NJ · overall 2/5
- Complete Care at Wall LLC — Wall, NJ · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 84 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you monitor residents' weight and eating, and what happens when someone starts losing weight?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "Who would be my family member's attending doctor here, and how often would they be seen?"
- "If my family member's health suddenly changes, how quickly do you reassess them and update their care?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "How often does the attending doctor physically see each resident, and how is that documented?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New Jersey midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 30% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 28 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 122 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complete Care at Woodlands | 0.5 mi | Plainfield, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Careone at the Highlands | 1.1 mi | Edison, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Aristacare at Norwood Terrace | 1.7 mi | Plainfield, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Ashbrook Care & Rehabilitation Center | 2.3 mi | Scotch Plains, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Hartwyck at Oak Tree | 2.5 mi | Edison, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| McAuley Hall Health Care Cente | 2.9 mi | Watchung, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Abingdon Care & Rehabilitation Center | 3.1 mi | Green Brook, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Brighton Gardens of Edison | 3.5 mi | Edison, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Aristacare at Cedar Oaks | 3.9 mi | South Plainfield, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Complete Care at Westfield, LLC | 4.1 mi | Westfield, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Runnells Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare | 4.6 mi | Berkeley Heights, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Complete Care at Clark LLC | 4.7 mi | Clark, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Union, NJ — 23 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Continuing Care at Lantern Hill — New Providence, NJ · overall 3/5
- Cornell Hall Care & Rehabilitation Center — Union, NJ · overall 3/5
- Cranford Park Care — Cranford, NJ · overall 2/5
- Elizabeth Nursing and Rehab Center — Elizabeth, NJ · overall 4/5
- Elmora Hills Health & Rehabilitation Center — Elizabeth, NJ · overall 5/5
- Mountainside Skilled Nursing and Rehab — Mountainside, NJ · overall 3/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315101.