How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Complete Care at Park Place LLC
2 Deer Park Drive, Monmouth Junction, NJ 08852 (opens Google Maps) · Middlesex County · (646) 988-4235· 94 certified beds · avg 89 residents/day · certified since Jan 30, 1997 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: COMPLETE CARE (85 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Mar 13, 2026
2
Serious findings on record
most recent Dec 7, 2022
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.21
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Dec 7, 2022 · F-0695
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Dec 7, 2022 · F-0695
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Why it matters: Mistakes in breathing care can quickly become life-threatening for residents who depend on oxygen or equipment.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jan 3, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Dec 7, 2022 · F-0710
The facility admitted a resident without a doctor's order, or did not make sure each resident stayed under a doctor's ongoing care.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Dec 7, 2022 · F-0710
The facility admitted a resident without a doctor's order, or did not make sure each resident stayed under a doctor's ongoing care.
Why it matters: A resident without proper physician oversight may go without medical direction for their treatment and medications.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jan 3, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
View all 18 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 13, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Mar 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Mar 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Mar 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Mar 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| Mar 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Mar 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700 |
| Mar 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · F-0849 |
| Aug 30, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Dec 7, 2022 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Dec 7, 2022 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility admitted a resident without a doctor's order, or did not make sure each resident stayed under a doctor's ongoing care. · F-0710 |
| Dec 7, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726 |
| Dec 7, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Dec 7, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Dec 7, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. · F-0660 |
| Dec 7, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Dec 7, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 9).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 2
2024
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 8 | 2 | J ▲ |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 9 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew Jersey averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.21
New Jersey average: 3.88
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.48
New Jersey average: 0.67
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.93
New Jersey average: 3.53
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.21 | 3.88 | 3.95 | bottom 16% in New Jersey; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.48 | 0.67 | 0.69 | bottom 37% in New Jersey; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.93 | 3.53 | 3.50 | bottom 18% in New Jersey; bottom 27% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.37 | 0.50 | 0.48 | bottom 45% in New Jersey; bottom 47% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 25.8 | 39.7 | 45.8 | top 16% in New Jersey; top 8% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 21.4 | 37.7 | 42.9 | top 19% in New Jersey; top 16% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.05, RN 0.46, weekend 2.79.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.05 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Complete Care at Park Place LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC NJ1 Opcos LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 07/01/2021 |
| PC Wta Opco Holdco LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2021 |
| SMS 2021 Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2021 |
| Stein, Shalom | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Aurora Guardian Holdco II Co-Borrower, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/30/2021 |
| Aurora Guardian Holdco II Mezz Borrower, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/30/2021 |
| Aurora Guardian Holdco II, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/30/2021 |
| Aurora Guardian II Realty, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/30/2021 |
| Aurora Guardian Partners II LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/30/2021 |
| Edeltuch, Yosef | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/02/2023 |
| Edeltuch, Yosef | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/02/2023 |
| Grewal, Baljinder | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Grewal, Baljinder | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| J & R Family Investments, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/30/2021 |
| L Friedman 2018 Family Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| L Friedman Family Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Landau Family Investment Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/30/2021 |
| Levovitz, Yitzchok | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| M Friedman 2018 Family Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/30/2021 |
| Mercado, Wanda | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/19/2022 |
Showing 20 of 34 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 14 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Complete Care — 85 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Complete Care at Phillipsburg, LLC — Phillipsburg, NJ · overall 3/5
- Complete Care at Plainfield LLC — Plainfield, NJ · overall 5/5
- Complete Care at Prospect Heights LLC — Hackensack, NJ · overall 2/5
- Complete Care at Regent LLC — Hackensack, NJ · overall 2/5
- Complete Care at Shorrock — Brick, NJ · overall 5/5
- Complete Care at Shrewsbury LLC — Shrewsbury, NJ · overall 3/5
- Complete Care at St Vincents LLC — Cedar Grove, NJ · overall 5/5
- Complete Care at Summit Ridge — West Orange, NJ · overall 4/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 84 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "Who would be my family member's attending doctor here, and how often would they be seen?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "What does the care plan for a brand-new resident cover in the first 48 hours, and who writes it?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How do you help residents maintain their daily living skills, and how do you measure whether it's working?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New Jersey midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 26% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 34 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 65 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carnegie Post Acute Care at Princeton LLC | 2.1 mi | Princeton, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Merwick Care & Rehabilitation Center, LLC | 3.4 mi | Plainsboro, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Stonebridge at Montgomery Health Care Center | 3.9 mi | Skillman, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Elms Rehab and Healthcare Center of Cranbury | 5.7 mi | Cranbury, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Cranbury Center | 7.4 mi | Monroe Township, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Village Point | 7.7 mi | Monroe Township, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Gardens at Monroe Healthcare and Rehabilitation, T | 8.4 mi | Monroe Township, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Meadow Lakes | 8.9 mi | East Windsor, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Careone at East Brunswick | 8.9 mi | East Brunswick, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bridgeway Care and Rehab Center at Hillsborough | 9.2 mi | Hillsborough, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Regency Heritage Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 9.4 mi | Somerset, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Avalon Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 9.5 mi | Hamilton, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Middlesex, NJ — 25 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Embassy Manor at Edison Nursing and Rehabilitation — Edison, NJ · overall 3/5
- Hartwyck at Oak Tree — Edison, NJ · overall 4/5
- New Jersey Veterans Memorial Home Menlo — Edison, NJ · overall 5/5
- Preferred Care at Old Bridge, LLC — Old Bridge, NJ · overall 5/5
- Reformed Church Home — Old Bridge, NJ · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315362.