New JerseyBurlington

Complete Care at Marcella

2305 Rancocas Road, Burlington, NJ 08016 · Burlington County · 150 certified beds · avg 143 residents/day · certified since May 2, 1994

Part of chain: COMPLETE CARE (85 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$62,666
Fines, last 3 years
3.59
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 12, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jun 22, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 12, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Jul 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 21, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Jun 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Nov 21, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 21, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Nov 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Nov 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint
Nov 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Nov 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Aug 11, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Aug 11, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Aug 11, 2021B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Aug 11, 2021B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202140D
202370F
202410D
202530E
202611J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $62,666.

DateTypeAmount / length
May 12, 2026Fine$62,666

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Jersey avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.593.883.95bottom 46% in New Jersey; bottom 41% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.390.670.69bottom 21% in New Jersey; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.163.533.50bottom 38% in New Jersey; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.200.500.48bottom 11% in New Jersey; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)36.339.745.8top 41% in New Jersey; top 27% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)20.037.742.9top 15% in New Jersey; top 13% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.57, RN 0.39, weekend 3.14. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
PC NJ1 Opcos LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%07/01/2021
PC Wta Opco Holdco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest07/01/2021
SMS 2021 TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest07/01/2021
Stein, ShalomIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Aurora Guardian Holdco II Co-Borrower, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Aurora Guardian Holdco II Mezz Borrower, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Aurora Guardian Holdco II, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Aurora Guardian II Realty, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Aurora Guardian Partners II LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Hepner-Elcheck, LisaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Hoch, RobertIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Hoch, RobertIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
J & R Family Investments, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Kaufman, ChaimIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Kaufman, ChaimIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
L Friedman 2018 Family TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
L Friedman Family Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Landau Family Investment TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
M Friedman 2018 Family TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Marcella Center Realty, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Complete Care at Burlington Woods, LLC0.6 miBurlington, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Masonic Village at Burlington1.9 miBurlington, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Bristol Health & Rehab Center4.6 miBristol, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Mount Holly Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center4.7 miLumberton, NJ★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Careone at Moorestown5.8 miMoorestown, NJ★★★☆☆3/5
Total Rehab Moorestown6.2 miMoorestown, NJ★★★☆☆2/5
Willowbrooke Court Skilled Care at Evergreens6.4 miMoorestown, NJ★★★★★5/5
Cambridge Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center6.8 miMoorestown, NJ★★★☆☆2/5
River's Edge Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center7.2 miPhiladelphia, PA★★★★☆3/5
Juniper Village at Bucks County Rehab and SKD Care7.6 miBensalem, PA★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Burlington →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315330.