PennsylvaniaReading

Complete Care at Berkshire LLC

5501 Perkiomen Avenue, Reading, PA 19606 · Berks County · 130 certified beds · avg 121 residents/day · certified since Sep 22, 1994

Part of chain: COMPLETE CARE (85 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$13,070
Fines, last 3 years
3.19
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 20, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 19, 2026 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (12)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
May 20, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 25, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Nov 20, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Nov 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Dec 15, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Dec 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Dec 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Dec 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340E
202410D
202530F
202641J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $13,070.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 25, 2026Fine$13,070

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityPennsylvania avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.193.943.95bottom 22% in Pennsylvania; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.540.800.69bottom 33% in Pennsylvania; bottom 44% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.033.583.50bottom 30% in Pennsylvania; bottom 33% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.530.560.48top 38% in Pennsylvania; top 30% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)39.144.545.8top 34% in Pennsylvania; top 34% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)41.239.942.9bottom 46% in Pennsylvania; top 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.32, RN 0.56, weekend 3.15. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
PC Pa Opcos LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%05/01/2021
PC Wta Opco Holdco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/01/2021
SMS 2021 TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/01/2021
Schwartz, HershelIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2021
Stein, ShalomIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Fairlane Gardens Nursing and Rehab at Reading0.5 miReading, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Wyomissing Health and Rehabilitation Center5.6 miReading, PA★★★★☆4/5
Spruce Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center5.8 miWest Reading, PA★★★★☆4/5
West Reading Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Ce6.0 miWest Reading, PA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Mifflin Center6.0 miShillington, PA★★★★☆4/5
Highlands at Wyomissing6.9 miWyomissing, PA★★★★★5/5
Laureldale Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Cent7.1 miLaureldale, PA★★★☆☆3/5
Transitional Sub-Acute Unit8.3 miWyomissing, PA★★★★★5/5
Sinking Spring Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation8.8 miSinking Spring, PA★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Zerbe Sisters Nursing Center,10.5 miNarvon, PA★★★★★5/5
Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at Pottstown11.0 miPottstown, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Pottstown Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Cente11.7 miPottstown, PA★☆☆☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Reading →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395938.