WisconsinBrookfield

Complete Care at Care Age

1755 N. Barker Rd., Brookfield, WI 53045 · Waukesha County · 110 certified beds · avg 71 residents/day · certified since Aug 5, 1993

Part of chain: COMPLETE CARE (85 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
5
Serious findings on record
$80,375
Fines, last 3 years
3.76
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jun 25, 2025 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jun 26, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 25, 2025 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 21, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 25, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 15, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 5, 2023 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 3, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 5, 2023 · F-0688

The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.

Why it matters: Without this care, residents can develop stiff, contracted joints and lose the ability to move on their own.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 3, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (31)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 3, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Jun 25, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jun 25, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Jun 25, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 25, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Jun 25, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jun 25, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · from a complaint
Jun 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jun 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jun 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Jun 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Jan 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Mar 20, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Mar 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jan 5, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jan 5, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jan 5, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Jan 5, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jan 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jan 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 11).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202372G ▲
202490E
2025153J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $80,375, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jun 25, 2025Fine$26,125
Jun 25, 2025Fine$54,250
Jun 25, 2025Payment Denial2 days from Jul 24, 2025

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityWisconsin avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.764.293.95bottom 37% in Wisconsin; bottom 50% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.541.010.69bottom 7% in Wisconsin; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.503.843.50bottom 42% in Wisconsin; top 42% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.320.680.48bottom 5% in Wisconsin; bottom 36% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)69.046.945.8bottom 8% in Wisconsin; bottom 6% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)52.939.742.9bottom 30% in Wisconsin; bottom 31% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.33, RN 0.62, weekend 4.03. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Des Capital LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/28/2025
JRK Investments LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/28/2025
Klugman, JacobIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/28/2025
PC Care Age Opco Holdco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%05/28/2025
PC Care Age Topco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2025
Peace Capital Holdings II LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2025
SMS 2021 TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2025
Stein, ShalomIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/28/2025
Sternbuch, DanielIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/28/2025
Care Age of Brookfield Propco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/29/2025
Culp, KarenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/28/2025
Culp, KarenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/28/2025
Des Capital LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/28/2025
Green, JenniferIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/28/2025
Green, JenniferIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/28/2025
Hellman, YosefIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/28/2025
Hellman, YosefIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/28/2025
JRK Investments LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/28/2025
Klugman, JacobIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/28/2025
PC Care Age Propco Holdco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/28/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Franciscan Woods0.7 miBrookfield, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Aria of Brookfield1.8 miBrookfield, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Aria of Waukesha3.4 miWaukesha, WI★☆☆☆☆2/5
Congregational Home, INC.4.3 miBrookfield, WI★★★★☆3/5
Lindengrove Waukesha5.8 miWaukesha, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Avina of Pewaukee5.8 miWaukesha, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Complete Care at Kensington5.8 miWaukesha, WI★☆☆☆☆2/5
Lindengrove New Berlin6.1 miNew Berlin, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5
St Camillus Health Center6.5 miWauwatosa, WI★★☆☆☆1/5
Menomonee Falls Health Services6.8 miMenomonee Falls, WI★★☆☆☆2/5
Lindengrove Menomonee Falls6.8 miMenomonee Falls, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5
St. Anne's Salvatorian Campus7.3 miMilwaukee, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Brookfield →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 525519.