10330 Prairie Ridge Blvd., Pleasant Prairie, WI 53158 (opens Google Maps) · Kenosha County · (262) 612-2800· 118 certified beds · avg 89 residents/day · certified since Aug 31, 2000 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: COMPLETE CARE (85 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Mar 27, 2025 · F-0610 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Why it matters: When allegations aren't investigated, harm to residents can continue unchecked.
Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 21, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 27, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 21, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 27, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 21, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 21 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. F-0851
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 14, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · F-0851 |
| May 14, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 14, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| May 14, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699 |
| Mar 27, 2025 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Mar 27, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Mar 27, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Mar 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Nov 14, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Nov 14, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 14, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint · F-0578 |
| Jan 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Jan 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Jan 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jan 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Sep 12, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Sep 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · from a complaint · F-0554 |
| Sep 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Sep 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 8 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 4 | 3 | K ▲ |
| 2026 | 5 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $65,556.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2025 | Fine | $65,556 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Wisconsin avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.06 | 4.29 | 3.95 | bottom 6% in Wisconsin; bottom 16% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.65 | 1.01 | 0.69 | bottom 17% in Wisconsin; top 42% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.71 | 3.84 | 3.50 | bottom 8% in Wisconsin; bottom 17% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.45 | 0.68 | 0.48 | bottom 26% in Wisconsin; top 40% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 60.9 | 46.9 | 45.8 | bottom 18% in Wisconsin; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 41.2 | 39.7 | 42.9 | bottom 45% in Wisconsin; top 49% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.44, RN 0.73, weekend 3.04.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.44 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Complete Care at Grande Prairie. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC Swi Holdco LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 06/01/2022 |
| PC Swi Topco LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 06/01/2022 |
| SMS 2021 Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 06/01/2022 |
| Bielinski, Renee | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/11/2022 |
| Bielinski, Renee | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/11/2022 |
| Des Capital LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Grande Prairie Propco LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Hellman, Yosef | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Hellman, Yosef | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Hughes, Crystal | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Hughes, Crystal | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| JRK Investments LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Klugman, Jacob | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Peace Capital Holdings II LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Sidhu, Sarfraz | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/17/2022 |
| Sidhu, Sarfraz | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/17/2022 |
| SMS 2021 Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Steele, William | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Steele, William | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Stein, Shalom | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
Showing 20 of 26 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 6 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Complete Care — 85 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 84 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avina on 32nd | 4.4 mi | Kenosha, WI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Brookside Care Center | 4.9 mi | Kenosha, WI | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Avina of Kenosha | 5.1 mi | Kenosha, WI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Clairidge House | 5.4 mi | Kenosha, WI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Sheridan Health and Rehabilitation Center | 5.5 mi | Kenosha, WI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Waters Edge Health and Rehabilitation Center | 6.4 mi | Kenosha, WI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Allure of Zion | 7.5 mi | Zion, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Alpine Care of Zion | 9.5 mi | Zion, IL | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Complete Care at Ridgewood LLC | 10.3 mi | Racine, WI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Oak Ridge Care Center | 10.9 mi | Union Grove, WI | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Lincoln Park Nursing and Rehab LLC | 11.2 mi | Racine, WI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Village at Victory Lakes, the | 11.7 mi | Lindenhurst, IL | ★★★★☆ | 2/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 525659.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details