Complete Care at Grande Prairie
10330 Prairie Ridge Blvd., Pleasant Prairie, WI 53158 · Kenosha County · 118 certified beds · avg 89 residents/day · certified since Aug 31, 2000
Part of chain: COMPLETE CARE (85 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Mar 27, 2025 · F-0610 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Why it matters: When allegations aren't investigated, harm to residents can continue unchecked.
Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.
Corrected: Apr 21, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 27, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Apr 21, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 27, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Apr 21, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (21)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2026 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| May 14, 2026 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. |
| May 14, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| May 14, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. |
| May 14, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. |
| Mar 27, 2025 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint |
| Mar 27, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Mar 27, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Mar 27, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint |
| Nov 14, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. |
| Nov 14, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Nov 14, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jan 8, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint |
| Jan 8, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint |
| Jan 8, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint |
| Jan 8, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Jan 8, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint |
| Sep 12, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Sep 12, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · from a complaint |
| Sep 12, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Sep 12, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 5).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 8 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 4 | 3 | K ▲ |
| 2026 | 5 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $65,556.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2025 | Fine | $65,556 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Wisconsin avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.06 | 4.29 | 3.95 | bottom 6% in Wisconsin; bottom 16% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.65 | 1.01 | 0.69 | bottom 17% in Wisconsin; top 42% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.71 | 3.84 | 3.50 | bottom 8% in Wisconsin; bottom 17% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.45 | 0.68 | 0.48 | bottom 26% in Wisconsin; top 40% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 60.9 | 46.9 | 45.8 | bottom 18% in Wisconsin; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 41.2 | 39.7 | 42.9 | bottom 45% in Wisconsin; top 49% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.44, RN 0.73, weekend 3.04. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC Swi Holdco LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 06/01/2022 |
| PC Swi Topco LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 06/01/2022 |
| SMS 2021 Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 06/01/2022 |
| Bielinski, Renee | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/11/2022 |
| Bielinski, Renee | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/11/2022 |
| Des Capital LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Grande Prairie Propco LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Hellman, Yosef | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Hellman, Yosef | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Hughes, Crystal | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Hughes, Crystal | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| JRK Investments LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Klugman, Jacob | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Peace Capital Holdings II LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Sidhu, Sarfraz | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/17/2022 |
| Sidhu, Sarfraz | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/17/2022 |
| SMS 2021 Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Steele, William | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Steele, William | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Stein, Shalom | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "How do your actual daily staffing levels compare to what's reported on Medicare's Care Compare website?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "How do you decide when a feeding tube is truly needed, and how do staff care for residents who have one?"
- "How do you learn about each resident's background and history, and how does that shape their care?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avina on 32nd | 4.4 mi | Kenosha, WI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Brookside Care Center | 4.9 mi | Kenosha, WI | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Avina of Kenosha | 5.1 mi | Kenosha, WI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Clairidge House | 5.4 mi | Kenosha, WI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Sheridan Health and Rehabilitation Center | 5.5 mi | Kenosha, WI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Waters Edge Health and Rehabilitation Center | 6.4 mi | Kenosha, WI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Allure of Zion | 7.5 mi | Zion, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Alpine Care of Zion | 9.5 mi | Zion, IL | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Complete Care at Ridgewood LLC | 10.3 mi | Racine, WI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Oak Ridge Care Center | 10.9 mi | Union Grove, WI | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Lincoln Park Nursing and Rehab LLC | 11.2 mi | Racine, WI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Village at Victory Lakes, the | 11.7 mi | Lindenhurst, IL | ★★★★☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Pleasant Prairie →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 525659.