WisconsinGlendale

Complete Care at Glendale West

6263 N Green Bay Ave, Glendale, WI 53209 · Milwaukee County · 94 certified beds · avg 78 residents/day · certified since Jul 15, 1994

Part of chain: COMPLETE CARE (85 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$11,180
Fines, last 3 years
3.81
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 24, 2022 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Nov 18, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 29, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 26, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (38)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Nov 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · from a complaint
Nov 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Nov 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Nov 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
May 22, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
May 22, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents the required written notice of their rights, the facility's rules, the services offered, and what those services cost. · from a complaint
May 22, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint
May 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
May 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
May 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
May 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
May 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
May 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
May 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
May 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
May 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Nov 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Sep 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Jun 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Jun 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Feb 5, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 5, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Nov 29, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 29, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Oct 24, 2022▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Oct 24, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Oct 24, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Oct 24, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 24, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Oct 24, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Oct 24, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Oct 24, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 24, 2022C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Oct 24, 2022C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 13).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2022101J ▲
202321G ▲
202490E
2025170E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $11,180.

DateTypeAmount / length
Nov 29, 2023Fine$11,180

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityWisconsin avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.814.293.95bottom 39% in Wisconsin; top 48% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.611.010.69bottom 13% in Wisconsin; top 46% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.493.843.50bottom 41% in Wisconsin; top 43% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.440.680.48bottom 24% in Wisconsin; top 41% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)62.946.945.8bottom 15% in Wisconsin; bottom 12% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)54.539.742.9bottom 28% in Wisconsin; bottom 29% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.38, RN 0.70, weekend 4.01. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
PC Glendale Holdco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%05/02/2024
SMS 2021 TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest95%04/30/2021
Stein, ShalomIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2021
Bielinski, ReneeIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/11/2022
Bielinski, ReneeIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/11/2022
Des Capital LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2021
Glendale Wi Propco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2021
Hayden, LakishaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2021
Hayden, LakishaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2021
Hellman, YosefIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2021
Hellman, YosefIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2021
JRK Investments LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2021
Kelly, DeniseIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2021
Kelly, DeniseIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2021
Klugman, JacobIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2021
Peace Capital Holdings II LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2021
Rosich, AleksandarIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2021
Rosich, AleksandarIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2021
SMS 2021 TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2021
Stein, ShalomIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Bayshore Nursing & Rehab0.9 miGlendale, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Bradley Estates Nursing and Rehab LLC3.8 miMilwaukee, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Amethyst Health of Brown Deer4.5 miMilwaukee, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Luther Manor5.3 miMilwaukee, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Avina of Milwaukee5.3 miMilwaukee, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Eastcastle PL Bradford Ter Conv Ctr5.4 miMilwaukee, WI★★★★★3/5
Milwaukee Catholic Home5.4 miMilwaukee, WI★★★★☆5/5
Edenbrook Lakeside5.6 miMilwaukee, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Saint Johns on the Lake5.7 miMilwaukee, WI★★★★☆3/5
St. Anne's Salvatorian Campus5.8 miMilwaukee, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Jewish Home and Care Center6.0 miMilwaukee, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Milwaukee Health and Rehab6.1 miMilwaukee, WI★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Glendale →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 525547.