How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Barclays Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
1412 Marlton Pike East, Cherry Hill, NJ 08034 (opens Google Maps) · Camden County · (856) 428-6100· 108 certified beds · avg 94 residents/day · certified since Jan 9, 1967 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: MB HEALTHCARE (12 facilities, chain avg rating 3.7★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Aug 20, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.37
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 26 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. F-0684
The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. F-0756
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. F-0578
View all 26 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Aug 20, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Aug 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Aug 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Aug 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Aug 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Aug 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · F-0727 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| Nov 30, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 30, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Nov 30, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Nov 30, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Nov 30, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · F-0849 |
| Nov 30, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 30, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. · F-0912 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (12 → 7).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 12
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 12 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew Jersey averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.37
New Jersey average: 3.88
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.45
New Jersey average: 0.67
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.88
New Jersey average: 3.53
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.37 | 3.88 | 3.95 | bottom 29% in New Jersey; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.45 | 0.67 | 0.69 | bottom 30% in New Jersey; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.88 | 3.53 | 3.50 | bottom 15% in New Jersey; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.18 | 0.50 | 0.48 | bottom 9% in New Jersey; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 57.1 | 39.7 | 45.8 | bottom 10% in New Jersey; bottom 21% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 62.5 | 37.7 | 42.9 | bottom 10% in New Jersey; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.69, RN 0.49, weekend 3.16.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.69 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Barclays Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Partnership
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barclays Parent LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 11/01/2015 |
| Brodt, Moshe | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2015 |
| Brodt, Yisroel | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2015 |
| Dorfman, Yaakov | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2015 |
| Farkovits, Joshua | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2015 |
| Lahasky, Ephram | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2015 |
| Piller, Mendy | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2015 |
| Rubin, Joshua | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2015 |
| Barclays Parent LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2015 |
| Brodt, Moshe | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2015 |
| Brodt, Moshe | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2015 |
| Brodt, Yisroel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2015 |
| Dorfman, Yaakov | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2015 |
| Farkovits, Joshua | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2015 |
| Lahasky, Ephram | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2015 |
| MB Healthcare Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2015 |
| Piller, Mendy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2015 |
| Rubin, Joshua | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2015 |
| Shack, Timothy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2022 |
| Sommers, Dovid | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2015 |
Showing 20 of 22 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 2 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain MB Healthcare — 12 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Canterbury at Cedar Grove — Cedar Grove, NJ · overall 3/5
- Carnegie Post Acute Care at Princeton LLC — Princeton, NJ · overall 4/5
- Clover Meadows Healthcare and Rehabilitation Cente — Lawrenceville, NJ · overall 5/5
- Doctors Subacute Healthcare, LLC — Paterson, NJ · overall 5/5
- Jersey Shore Post Acute Rehabilitation and Nursing — Neptune, NJ · overall 3/5
- Laurel Manor Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center — Stratford, NJ · overall 4/5
- Llanfair House Care & Rehabilitation Center — Wayne, NJ · overall 2/5
- Pine Acres Rehabilitation and Healthcare — Madison, NJ · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 11 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "Does a pharmacist review every resident's medications and chart monthly, and how are their concerns acted on?"
- "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "How many hours a day is a registered nurse physically in the building, including weekends?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New Jersey midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 57% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 22 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 141 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dwellside Care and Rehab | 1.1 mi | Cherry Hill, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Laurel Brook Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 1.6 mi | Mount Laurel, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Silver Healthcare Center | 1.8 mi | Cherry Hill, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Premier Cadbury of Cherry Hill | 2.0 mi | Cherry Hill, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Palace Rehabilitation and Care Center, the | 2.3 mi | Maple Shade, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| St Mary's Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare | 2.4 mi | Cherry Hill, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Careone at Evesham | 2.9 mi | Marlton, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Aristacare at Cherry Hill | 2.9 mi | Cherry Hill, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Complete Care at Kresson View, LLC | 3.9 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| River Front Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 4.1 mi | Pennsauken, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Complete Care at Voorhees, LLC | 4.2 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| United Methodist Communities at Collingswood | 4.4 mi | Collingswood, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Camden, NJ — 21 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Berlin Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Berlin, NJ · overall 4/5
- Echelon Care & Rehab — Voorhees, NJ · overall 4/5
- Elmwood Hills Healthcare Center LLC — Blackwood, NJ · overall 2/5
- Laurel Manor Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center — Stratford, NJ · overall 4/5
- Lions Gate — Voorhees, NJ · overall 4/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315013.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).