How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Doctors Subacute Healthcare, LLC
59 Birch Street, Paterson, NJ 07522 (opens Google Maps) · Passaic County · (973) 942-8899· 54 certified beds · avg 47 residents/day · certified since Jan 7, 1969 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: MB HEALTHCARE (12 facilities, chain avg rating 3.7★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Dec 2, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.94
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. F-0558
The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. F-0640
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
View all 16 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. · F-0711 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · F-0849 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Apr 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Apr 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · F-0602 |
| Apr 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Apr 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Apr 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Apr 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700 |
| Apr 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Dec 9, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Dec 9, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Dec 9, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 6).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew Jersey averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.94
New Jersey average: 3.88
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.98
New Jersey average: 0.67
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.45
New Jersey average: 3.53
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.94 | 3.88 | 3.95 | top 33% in New Jersey; top 42% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.98 | 0.67 | 0.69 | top 13% in New Jersey; top 17% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.45 | 3.53 | 3.50 | top 42% in New Jersey; top 45% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.58 | 0.50 | 0.48 | top 25% in New Jersey; top 25% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 24.4 | 39.7 | 45.8 | top 13% in New Jersey; top 6% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 30.8 | 37.7 | 42.9 | top 36% in New Jersey; top 30% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.78, RN 0.94, weekend 3.30.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.78 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Doctors Subacute Healthcare, LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Individual
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brodt, Moshe | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 28% | 07/27/2018 |
| Gerson, Aryeh | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 07/27/2018 |
| Brodt, Moshe | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/27/2018 |
| Dorfman, Yaakov | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/27/2018 |
| Gerson, Aryeh | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/27/2018 |
| Kahf, Amr | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/23/2019 |
| MB Healthcare Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/27/2018 |
| Piller, Mendy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/27/2018 |
| Sommers, Dovid | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/27/2018 |
| Svarc, Jonah | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/27/2018 |
| Wegh, Robert | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/27/2018 |
| Wegh, Robert | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/27/2018 |
All 12 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain MB Healthcare — 12 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Jersey Shore Post Acute Rehabilitation and Nursing — Neptune, NJ · overall 3/5
- Laurel Manor Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center — Stratford, NJ · overall 4/5
- Llanfair House Care & Rehabilitation Center — Wayne, NJ · overall 2/5
- Pine Acres Rehabilitation and Healthcare — Madison, NJ · overall 5/5
- Stratford Manor Rehabilitation and Care Center — West Orange, NJ · overall 4/5
- Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation, LLC — Portage, PA · overall 3/5
- Maybrook Hills Rehabilitation and Healthcare Cente — Altoona, PA · overall 2/5
- Barclays Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Cherry Hill, NJ · overall 4/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 11 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
- "How do you make sure resident assessments are completed and submitted to the state on time?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "How often does each resident's doctor visit and review their care in person?"
- "How do you coordinate hospice care, and can residents stay here while receiving it?"
- "What percentage of your residents and staff are vaccinated against flu and pneumonia, and how do you offer the vaccines?"
- "If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
- "What safeguards do you have to protect residents' money and belongings, and what happens when something goes missing?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 24% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 211 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preakness Healthcare Center | 1.8 mi | Wayne, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Barnert Subacute Rehabilitation Center, LLC | 2.1 mi | Paterson, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Atlas Rehabilitation and Healthcare at Daughters O | 2.5 mi | Clifton, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Excel Care at Wayne | 2.7 mi | Wayne, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Complete Care at Fair Lawn Edge | 2.8 mi | Paterson, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Complete Care at St Vincents LLC | 3.6 mi | Cedar Grove, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Atrium Post Acute Care of Wayne | 3.7 mi | Wayne, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Arbor Glen Center | 3.9 mi | Cedar Grove, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Windmere | 3.9 mi | North Haledon, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Complete Care at Chestnut Hill LLC | 4.3 mi | Passaic, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Complete Care at Cedar Grove | 4.5 mi | Cedar Grove, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Complete Care at Hamilton, LLC | 4.7 mi | Passaic, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Passaic, NJ — 19 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Health Center at Bloomingdale — Bloomingdale, NJ · overall 5/5
- Lakeland Nursing & Rehab — Haskell, NJ · overall 4/5
- Llanfair House Care & Rehabilitation Center — Wayne, NJ · overall 2/5
- Phoenix Center for Rehabilitation and Pediatrics — Haskell, NJ · overall 3/5
- Arbor Ridge Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Wayne, NJ · overall 2/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315096.