Elmwood Hills Healthcare Center LLC
425 Woodbury-Turnersville Road, Blackwood, NJ 08012 · Camden County · 300 certified beds · avg 290 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 1977
Part of chain: OCEAN HEALTHCARE (11 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 16, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Nov 25, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 19, 2023 · F-0684
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: May 23, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (25)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| May 9, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint |
| May 9, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. |
| May 9, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint |
| May 9, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| May 9, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| May 9, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. |
| May 9, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| May 9, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. |
| Apr 19, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Apr 19, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. |
| Apr 19, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Apr 19, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Apr 19, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. |
| Apr 19, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. |
| Apr 19, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Apr 19, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Apr 19, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. |
| Apr 19, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Apr 19, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Apr 19, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. |
| Apr 19, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Apr 22, 2021 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Apr 22, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Apr 22, 2021 | B · Minimal risk, repeated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (13 → 8).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 13 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 9 | 1 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $9,113.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2025 | Fine | $9,113 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.73 | 3.88 | 3.95 | top 45% in New Jersey; bottom 48% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.38 | 0.67 | 0.69 | bottom 17% in New Jersey; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.32 | 3.53 | 3.50 | top 49% in New Jersey; bottom 48% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.20 | 0.50 | 0.48 | bottom 12% in New Jersey; bottom 13% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 46.4 | 39.7 | 45.8 | bottom 30% in New Jersey; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 33.3 | 37.7 | 42.9 | top 42% in New Jersey; top 33% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.48, RN 0.35, weekend 3.10. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drew, Zalman | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/25/2013 |
| Feigenbaum, Avraham | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/25/2013 |
| Feigenbaum, Deborah | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/25/2013 |
| Maierovits, Avrohom | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/25/2013 |
| MDF Family 2015 Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 15% | 12/28/2016 |
| Drew, Zalman | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/25/2013 |
| Dynamic Healthcare Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2013 |
| Dynamic Healthcare Management LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/29/2025 |
| Feigenbaum, Avraham | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/25/2013 |
| Feigenbaum, Avraham | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/25/2013 |
| Feigenbaum, Deborah | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/25/2013 |
| Maierovits, Avrohom | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/25/2013 |
| Maierovits, Avrohom | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/25/2013 |
| Manufacturers & Traders Trust Company | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/25/2013 |
| Weissman, Moshe | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/30/2023 |
| Weissman, Moshe | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/30/2023 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "How soon after admission is a full assessment completed, and how are the findings shared with the family?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "What do you do daily to keep residents moving, and how do you help residents at risk of losing mobility?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "How often is each resident's medication list reviewed, and who decides when a drug can be reduced or stopped?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deptford Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare | 3.1 mi | Deptford, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Advanced Subacute Rehabilitation Center at Sewell | 3.2 mi | Sewell, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Center for Rehab & Nursing Washington Township | 3.7 mi | Sewell, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Laurel Manor Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 4.3 mi | Stratford, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Atlas Post Acute at Woodbury Country Club | 4.5 mi | Woodbury, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| United Methodist Communities at Pitman | 4.9 mi | Pitman, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Atlas Rehabilitation and Healthcare at Washington | 5.3 mi | Sewell, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Voorhees | 6.3 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Lions Gate | 6.7 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Echelon Care & Rehab | 7.0 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Voorhees Pediatric Facility | 7.0 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| The Subacute at Autumn Lake Healthcare | 7.3 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315159.