How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Laurel Manor Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center
18 W Laurel Road, Stratford, NJ 08084 (opens Google Maps) · Camden County · (856) 784-2400· 106 certified beds · avg 95 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1969 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: MB HEALTHCARE (12 facilities, chain avg rating 3.7★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Aug 28, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.44
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have doctor's orders in place for a resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted. · from a complaint F-0635
The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. F-0700
The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. F-0645
View all 19 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have doctor's orders in place for a resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted. · from a complaint · F-0635 |
| Aug 28, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700 |
| Aug 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Aug 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Aug 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Aug 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Aug 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 17, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Apr 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Apr 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint · F-0657 |
| Apr 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Apr 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Apr 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Apr 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Apr 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Apr 17, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Nov 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Feb 9, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 6).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2 | 0 | F |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 9 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew Jersey averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.44
New Jersey average: 3.88
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.49
New Jersey average: 0.67
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.10
New Jersey average: 3.53
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.44 | 3.88 | 3.95 | bottom 34% in New Jersey; bottom 34% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.49 | 0.67 | 0.69 | bottom 38% in New Jersey; bottom 37% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.10 | 3.53 | 3.50 | bottom 32% in New Jersey; bottom 36% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.32 | 0.50 | 0.48 | bottom 34% in New Jersey; bottom 36% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 43.8 | 39.7 | 45.8 | bottom 35% in New Jersey; top 47% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 46.2 | 37.7 | 42.9 | bottom 30% in New Jersey; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.45, RN 0.49, weekend 3.11.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.45 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Laurel Manor Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frankl, Cindie | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/19/2011 |
| Laurel Parent LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 12/19/2011 |
| Brodt, Moshe | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/19/2011 |
| Elahi, Abdul | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/07/2021 |
| Frankl, Cindie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/19/2011 |
| Klugman, Dovid | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2021 |
| Klugman, Dovid | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2021 |
| Laurel Parent LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/19/2011 |
| MB Healthcare Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/19/2011 |
| Sommers, Dovid | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/19/2011 |
All 10 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain MB Healthcare — 12 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Llanfair House Care & Rehabilitation Center — Wayne, NJ · overall 2/5
- Pine Acres Rehabilitation and Healthcare — Madison, NJ · overall 5/5
- Stratford Manor Rehabilitation and Care Center — West Orange, NJ · overall 4/5
- Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation, LLC — Portage, PA · overall 3/5
- Maybrook Hills Rehabilitation and Healthcare Cente — Altoona, PA · overall 2/5
- Barclays Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Cherry Hill, NJ · overall 4/5
- Canterbury at Cedar Grove — Cedar Grove, NJ · overall 3/5
- Carnegie Post Acute Care at Princeton LLC — Princeton, NJ · overall 4/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 11 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "When a new resident arrives, how do you make sure the doctor's orders for their care and medications are in place from day one?"
- "What alternatives do you try before using bed rails, and how do you involve families in that decision?"
- "How do you screen new residents for mental health and disability-related needs, and how do you provide the specialized services they require?"
- "What does the care plan for a brand-new resident cover in the first 48 hours, and who writes it?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New Jersey midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 44% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 106 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Voorhees | 2.1 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Lions Gate | 2.5 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Echelon Care & Rehab | 2.8 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Voorhees Pediatric Facility | 2.8 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| The Subacute at Autumn Lake Healthcare | 3.0 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Elmwood Hills Healthcare Center LLC | 4.3 mi | Blackwood, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Silver Healthcare Center | 4.7 mi | Cherry Hill, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Complete Care at Kresson View, LLC | 4.7 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| St Mary's Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare | 4.8 mi | Cherry Hill, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Deptford Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare | 5.2 mi | Deptford, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Complete Care at Voorhees, LLC | 5.3 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Barclays Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 6.0 mi | Cherry Hill, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Camden, NJ — 21 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Majestic Center for Rehab & Sub-Acute Care — Camden, NJ · overall 5/5
- Premier Cadbury of Cherry Hill — Cherry Hill, NJ · overall 2/5
- River Front Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Pennsauken, NJ · overall 1/5
- The Fountains of Atco — Atco, NJ · overall 1/5SFF
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315008.