New JerseyPrinceton

Carnegie Post Acute Care at Princeton LLC

5000 Windrow Drive, Princeton, NJ 08540 · Mercer County · 180 certified beds · avg 152 residents/day · certified since Sep 4, 1997

Part of chain: MB HEALTHCARE (12 facilities, chain avg rating 3.7★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.57
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (28)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Feb 25, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Feb 25, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program.
Feb 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Feb 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Feb 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Feb 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule. · from a complaint
Feb 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · from a complaint
Feb 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Feb 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Aug 3, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Jan 31, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 31, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jan 31, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jan 31, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jan 31, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jan 31, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 31, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jan 31, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times.
Jan 31, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Jan 31, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 31, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Jan 31, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Oct 27, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Oct 27, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Oct 27, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Oct 27, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (12 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202040E
2023130E
202410D
2025100E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Jersey avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.573.883.95bottom 44% in New Jersey; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.550.670.69bottom 48% in New Jersey; bottom 45% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.203.533.50bottom 41% in New Jersey; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.360.500.48bottom 41% in New Jersey; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)52.739.745.8bottom 17% in New Jersey; bottom 30% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)59.137.742.9bottom 13% in New Jersey; bottom 23% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.49, RN 0.54, weekend 3.13. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Brodt, MosheIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest51%06/14/2023
Frankl, CindieIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest6%06/14/2023
Joes Beach LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest14%06/14/2023
The Beach Is Back TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest14%06/14/2023
Brodt, MosheIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/14/2023
Czapnik, ChaimIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/14/2023
Czapnik, ChaimIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/14/2023
Dorfman, YaakovIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/14/2023
Frankl, CindieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/14/2023
Joes Beach LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/14/2023
MB Healthcare Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/14/2023
Pecora, JosephIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/14/2023
Piller, MendyIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/29/2025
Schloss, DeborahIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/08/2025
Sommers, DovidIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/14/2023
Sommers, DovidIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/14/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Merwick Care & Rehabilitation Center, LLC1.4 miPlainsboro, NJ★★★☆☆2/5
Complete Care at Park Place LLC2.1 miMonmouth Junction, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Stonebridge at Montgomery Health Care Center4.0 miSkillman, NJ★★★☆☆2/5
The Elms Rehab and Healthcare Center of Cranbury6.3 miCranbury, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5
Clover Meadows Healthcare and Rehabilitation Cente7.5 miLawrenceville, NJ★★★★★4/5
Avalon Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center7.8 miHamilton, NJ★☆☆☆☆1/5
Lawrence Rehabilitation Hospital7.8 miLawrenceville, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5
Lawrence Rehab & Hcc/The Meadows at Lawrence8.0 miLawrenceville, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
Cranbury Center8.3 miMonroe Township, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
Meadow Lakes8.7 miEast Windsor, NJ★★★☆☆2/5
Gardens at Monroe Healthcare and Rehabilitation, T9.0 miMonroe Township, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Village Point9.3 miMonroe Township, NJ★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Princeton →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315370.