How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Beloit
2121 Pioneer Dr., Beloit, WI 53511 (opens Google Maps) · Rock County · (608) 365-9526· 120 certified beds · avg 77 residents/day · certified since Jul 12, 2001 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE (59 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Feb 12, 2026
2
Serious findings on record
most recent Nov 25, 2025
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.47
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Nov 25, 2025 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Nov 25, 2025 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Dec 17, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Nov 25, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Nov 25, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Dec 17, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. F-0804
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. F-0697
View all 14 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Feb 12, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Jan 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
| Jan 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Jan 6, 2026 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint · F-0732 |
| Nov 25, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Nov 25, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Dec 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · from a complaint · F-0561 |
| Dec 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for residents with a colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy — surgical openings in the abdomen that let waste leave the body into a pouch. These require regular, skilled attention to stay clean and healthy. · from a complaint · F-0691 |
| Jun 29, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 29, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 29, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jun 29, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
Inspection trend by year
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 2
2026
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 2 | 2 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 6 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityWisconsin averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.47
Wisconsin average: 4.29
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.63
Wisconsin average: 1.01
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.09
Wisconsin average: 3.84
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Wisconsin avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.47 | 4.29 | 3.95 | bottom 1% in Wisconsin; bottom 3% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.63 | 1.01 | 0.69 | bottom 14% in Wisconsin; top 45% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.09 | 3.84 | 3.50 | bottom 1% in Wisconsin; bottom 2% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.48 | 0.68 | 0.48 | bottom 29% in Wisconsin; top 36% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 37.3 | 46.9 | 45.8 | top 23% in Wisconsin; top 30% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 23.1 | 39.7 | 42.9 | top 22% in Wisconsin; top 18% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.78, RN 0.70, weekend 2.35.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (2.78 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Autumn Lake Healthcare at Beloit. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A&r Stern Family Holdings, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 62% | 02/01/2019 |
| Davis, Yehoshua | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 13% | 02/01/2019 |
| Gluck, Rivka | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 20% | 02/01/2019 |
| Stern, Aryeh | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2019 |
| A&r Stern Family Holdings, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2019 |
| Accurate Staffing LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2019 |
| Beloit Rehab Realty LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2019 |
| Beloit Rehab Realty LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2019 |
| Brand Sonnenschine LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2019 |
| Davis, Yehoshua | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2019 |
| Gluck, Rivka | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2019 |
| Schwartz, Mark | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2019 |
| Schwartz, Mark | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2019 |
| Stern, Aryeh | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2019 |
| Tolentino, Annabelle | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2019 |
| Tolentino, Annabelle | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2019 |
| Viken, Susan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2019 |
| Viken, Susan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2019 |
All 18 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Autumn Lake Healthcare — 59 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Autumn Lake Healthcare at Greenfield — Milwaukee, WI · overall 1/5abuse
- Autumn Lake Healthcare at Crystal Springs — Elkins, WV · overall 1/5
- Nella's at Autumn Lake Healthcare — Elkins, WV · overall 1/5
- Autumn Lake Healthcare at Bucks Hill — Waterbury, CT · overall 4/5
- Autumn Lake Healthcare at Cromwell — Cromwell, CT · overall 4/5
- Autumn Lake Healthcare at Madison — Madison, CT · overall 2/5
- Autumn Lake Healthcare at New Britain — New Britain, CT · overall 5/5
- Autumn Lake Healthcare at Norwalk — Norwalk, CT · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 58 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
- "What is your nurse and aide staffing ratio on each shift, including nights and weekends?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
- "Where do you post your daily staffing numbers, and can I see today's?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Wisconsin midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 37% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 18 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 24 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beloit Health and Rehabilitation Center | 1.1 mi | Beloit, WI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Fair Oaks Rehab & Healthcare | 3.8 mi | South Beloit, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Alden Meadow Park HCC | 8.0 mi | Clinton, WI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Cedar Crest Health Center | 8.8 mi | Janesville, WI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Oak Park Place of Janesville | 9.7 mi | Janesville, WI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| St Elizabeth Nursing Home | 10.5 mi | Janesville, WI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mercy Manor Transition Center | 10.8 mi | Janesville, WI | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Rock Haven | 12.1 mi | Janesville, WI | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| River Bluff Nursing Home | 14.6 mi | Rockford, IL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Avira Health Pavilion | 14.9 mi | Loves Park, IL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Alpine Fireside Health Center | 15.0 mi | Rockford, IL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Rock River Health Care | 15.1 mi | Rockford, IL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Rock, WI — 10 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Edgerton Care Center, INC — Edgerton, WI · overall 1/5abuse
- Evansville Manor Nursing and Rehab, LLC — Evansville, WI · overall 1/5abuseSFF
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 525663.