VI at Silverstone, a VI and Plaza Companies Commun

Name: VI at Silverstone, a VI and Plaza Companies Commun
Address: 22605 NORTH 74TH STREET, Scottsdale, AZ, 85255, US
Telephone: 4804786200

22605 North 74th Street, Scottsdale, AZ 85255 · Maricopa County · 24 certified beds · avg 20 residents/day · certified since Jun 9, 2011

Part of chain: VI LIVING (9 facilities, chain avg rating 4.4★)

1/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

6.35

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (17)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
May 28, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
May 28, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop, carry out, or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
May 28, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not educate its staff on residents' rights and the facility's responsibilities toward residents. Staff can only respect rights they've been taught about.
May 28, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
May 28, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not include required infection control training — with written standards, policies, and procedures — as part of its infection prevention program.
May 28, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide its staff with required training on behavioral health — caring for residents with conditions like dementia, depression, or other mental health needs.
May 28, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 28, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
May 28, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
May 28, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 28, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide or arrange specialized rehabilitation services — such as physical, occupational, or speech therapy — for residents who needed them.
May 28, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Mar 13, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 13, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Mar 13, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 29, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 2, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 12).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2023	2	E
2025	3	E
2026	12	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Arizona avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	6.35	3.97	3.95	top 6% in Arizona; top 3% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	2.15	0.69	0.69	top 2% in Arizona; top 1% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	5.38	3.50	3.50	top 7% in Arizona; top 4% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	1.74	0.49	0.48	top 2% in Arizona; top 1% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	25.0	45.2	45.8	top 8% in Arizona; top 7% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	9.1	43.6	42.9	top 3% in Arizona; top 3% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.95, RN 2.02, weekend 5.04. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Cc-Development Group, INC.	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	03/01/2011
Cc-Silverstone, INC	Organization	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2011
Margot and Tom Pritzker Foundation	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	10%	05/22/2025
P. G. - Daniel Trust	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	01/01/2012
P. G. - Don #3 Trust	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	01/01/2012
P. G. - Jim Trust	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	01/01/2012
P. G. - Johnny Trust	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	01/01/2012
P. G. - Karen Trust	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	01/01/2012
P. G. - Linda Trust	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	01/01/2012
P. G. - Nicholas Trust	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	01/01/2012
P. G. - Tony Trust	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	01/01/2012
Pritzker Pucker Family Foundation No. 2	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	05/22/2025
Classic Residence Management Limited Partnership	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2011
Classic Residence Management Limited Partnership	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	07/03/2025
Cope, Tara	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2018
Evraets, Melissa	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	08/01/2020
Evraets, Melissa	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/01/2020
Gonzalez, Luis	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/05/2011
Gonzalez, Luis	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/05/2011
Koszylko, Tomek	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/15/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
"What training do new hires get before working with residents, and what ongoing training do all staff receive?"
"How and how often are staff trained on residents' rights?"
"What training do all staff get on dementia care and on spotting and reporting abuse?"
"How are staff trained on infection control, and how often is that training refreshed?"
"What training do your staff receive for caring for residents with dementia or mental health conditions?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
VI at Grayhawk, a VI and Plaza Companies Community	2.3 mi	Scottsdale, AZ	★★★★★	5/5
Sante of North Scottsdale	4.6 mi	Scottsdale, AZ	★★★☆☆	2/5
Acacia Health Center	5.3 mi	Phoenix, AZ	★★★★★	5/5
Life Care Center of Paradise Valley	6.3 mi	Phoenix, AZ	★★★☆☆	2/5	abuse
Ridgecrest Post Acute	6.4 mi	Phoenix, AZ	★★★★★	4/5
Phoenix Mountain Post Acute	7.4 mi	Phoenix, AZ	★★★☆☆	2/5
Shea Post Acute Rehabilitation Center	8.3 mi	Scottsdale, AZ	★★★★★	5/5
Life Care Center of Scottsdale	8.5 mi	Scottsdale, AZ	★★★★★	4/5
Advance Health Care of Scottsdale	9.0 mi	Scottsdale, AZ	★★★★★	4/5
Arizona State Veteran Home-Phx	9.3 mi	Phoenix, AZ	★★☆☆☆	1/5	abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Scottsdale →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035281.

The Care File

Visit checklist — VI at Silverstone, a VI and Plaza Companies Commun

22605 North 74th Street, Scottsdale, AZ 85255 · 4804786200

Health inspection rating 1/5 · CMS overall 2/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
☐ "What training do new hires get before working with residents, and what ongoing training do all staff receive?"
☐ "How and how often are staff trained on residents' rights?"
☐ "What training do all staff get on dementia care and on spotting and reporting abuse?"
☐ "How are staff trained on infection control, and how often is that training refreshed?"
☐ "What training do your staff receive for caring for residents with dementia or mental health conditions?"
☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 035281 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)