Sante of North Scottsdale
17490 North 93rd Street, Scottsdale, AZ 85255 · Maricopa County · 72 certified beds · avg 68 residents/day · certified since Mar 20, 2012
Part of chain: SANTE (5 facilities, chain avg rating 4.4★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (18)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Dec 5, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Dec 5, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint |
| Oct 24, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Sep 13, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Sep 13, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. |
| Sep 13, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Sep 13, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately. |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Aug 24, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Jul 8, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jul 8, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. |
| Jul 8, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. |
| Jul 8, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. |
| Jul 8, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 8).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 11 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Arizona avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.89 | 3.97 | 3.95 | top 15% in Arizona; top 15% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.15 | 0.69 | 0.69 | top 10% in Arizona; top 11% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.25 | 3.50 | 3.50 | top 17% in Arizona; top 17% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.93 | 0.49 | 0.48 | top 7% in Arizona; top 7% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 58.4 | 45.2 | 45.8 | bottom 15% in Arizona; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 80.0 | 43.6 | 42.9 | bottom 4% in Arizona; bottom 6% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.19, RN 1.22, weekend 4.52. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gallow, Marsha | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 02/10/2012 |
| Hansen, Charles | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 11/24/2010 |
| Kayhan, Ashley | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 02/10/2012 |
| Leach Family Revocable Trust Dated 2/25/24 | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/06/2022 |
| Mickeleit Family Revocable Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2021 |
| Munch Family Irrevocable Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/01/2011 |
| Munch Tooke, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 02/10/2012 |
| Munch, Michael | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 11/24/2010 |
| RDW Arizona LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 02/10/2012 |
| Sante Ab LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/01/2015 |
| Sante P4 LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2015 |
| Sante P5 LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/01/2016 |
| Sante Scottsdale LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 11/24/2010 |
| Schaefer, Jacob | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 03/29/2011 |
| Short, Jacqueline | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2022 |
| Short, Sterling | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2022 |
| SP Re Scottsdale LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 02/10/2012 |
| SP TRC Scottsdale LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 02/10/2012 |
| Sterling & Jacqueline Holdings,llc | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2022 |
| Tooke, Arthur | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/01/2011 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How often is each resident's medication list reviewed, and who decides when a drug can be reduced or stopped?"
- "What is your approach to psychiatric medications — how do you try non-drug options first and work to reduce doses over time?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How do you explain health changes and treatment options to residents and their families?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VI at Grayhawk, a VI and Plaza Companies Community | 2.9 mi | Scottsdale, AZ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Shea Post Acute Rehabilitation Center | 4.0 mi | Scottsdale, AZ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Scottsdale | 4.2 mi | Scottsdale, AZ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| VI at Silverstone, a VI and Plaza Companies Commun | 4.6 mi | Scottsdale, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Advance Health Care of Scottsdale | 4.7 mi | Scottsdale, AZ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Phoenix Mountain Post Acute | 6.3 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Paradise Valley | 6.9 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Ridgecrest Post Acute | 6.9 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Arizona State Veteran Home-Phx | 7.7 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Acacia Health Center | 7.9 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Scottsdale →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035286.