ArizonaScottsdale

Sante of North Scottsdale

17490 North 93rd Street, Scottsdale, AZ 85255 · Maricopa County · 72 certified beds · avg 68 residents/day · certified since Mar 20, 2012

Part of chain: SANTE (5 facilities, chain avg rating 4.4★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.89
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Sep 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Sep 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Sep 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Sep 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Sep 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately.
Sep 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Sep 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jul 8, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 8, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Jul 8, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jul 8, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Jul 8, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202250E
202310D
2024110E
202510D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityArizona avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.893.973.95top 15% in Arizona; top 15% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.150.690.69top 10% in Arizona; top 11% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.253.503.50top 17% in Arizona; top 17% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.930.490.48top 7% in Arizona; top 7% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)58.445.245.8bottom 15% in Arizona; bottom 19% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)80.043.642.9bottom 4% in Arizona; bottom 6% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.19, RN 1.22, weekend 4.52. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Gallow, MarshaIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/10/2012
Hansen, CharlesIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest11/24/2010
Kayhan, AshleyIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/10/2012
Leach Family Revocable Trust Dated 2/25/24Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/06/2022
Mickeleit Family Revocable TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2021
Munch Family Irrevocable TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/01/2011
Munch Tooke, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/10/2012
Munch, MichaelIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest11/24/2010
RDW Arizona LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/10/2012
Sante Ab LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/01/2015
Sante P4 LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2015
Sante P5 LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/01/2016
Sante Scottsdale LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%11/24/2010
Schaefer, JacobIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest03/29/2011
Short, JacquelineIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2022
Short, SterlingIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2022
SP Re Scottsdale LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/10/2012
SP TRC Scottsdale LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/10/2012
Sterling & Jacqueline Holdings,llcOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2022
Tooke, ArthurIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/01/2011

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
VI at Grayhawk, a VI and Plaza Companies Community2.9 miScottsdale, AZ★★★★★5/5
Shea Post Acute Rehabilitation Center4.0 miScottsdale, AZ★★★★★5/5
Life Care Center of Scottsdale4.2 miScottsdale, AZ★★★★★4/5
VI at Silverstone, a VI and Plaza Companies Commun4.6 miScottsdale, AZ★★☆☆☆1/5
Advance Health Care of Scottsdale4.7 miScottsdale, AZ★★★★★4/5
Phoenix Mountain Post Acute6.3 miPhoenix, AZ★★★☆☆2/5
Life Care Center of Paradise Valley6.9 miPhoenix, AZ★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Ridgecrest Post Acute6.9 miPhoenix, AZ★★★★★4/5
Arizona State Veteran Home-Phx7.7 miPhoenix, AZ★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Acacia Health Center7.9 miPhoenix, AZ★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Scottsdale →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035286.