How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Shea Post Acute Rehabilitation Center
11150 North 92nd Street, Scottsdale, AZ 85260 (opens Google Maps) · Maricopa County · (480) 860-1766· 120 certified beds · avg 106 residents/day · certified since Apr 9, 1985 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Dec 13, 2024
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.57
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 11 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. F-0658
The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. F-0655
View all 11 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Jun 2, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jun 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Jun 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| Jun 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Jun 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Jun 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Apr 14, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Apr 14, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not perform required COVID-19 testing on residents and staff. · F-0886 |
| Apr 14, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Apr 14, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 1).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityArizona averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.57
Arizona average: 3.97
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.78
Arizona average: 0.69
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.96
Arizona average: 3.50
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Arizona avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.57 | 3.97 | 3.95 | bottom 42% in Arizona; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.78 | 0.69 | 0.69 | top 28% in Arizona; top 29% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.96 | 3.50 | 3.50 | bottom 27% in Arizona; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.40 | 0.49 | 0.48 | bottom 48% in Arizona; top 48% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 47.5 | 45.2 | 45.8 | bottom 43% in Arizona; bottom 43% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 46.7 | 43.6 | 42.9 | bottom 43% in Arizona; bottom 41% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.30, RN 0.72, weekend 2.73.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.30 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Shea Post Acute Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11150 North 92nd Street, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2015 |
| Albrechtsen, Joshua | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2015 |
| Albrechtsen, Joshua | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2015 |
| Albrechtsen, Joshua | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2015 |
| Burnam, Soon | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2015 |
| Ensign Services INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2015 |
| Keetch, Chad | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2011 |
| Mal, Himmat | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/18/2023 |
| Mal, Himmat | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/18/2023 |
| Mal, Himmat | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/18/2023 |
| Monks, Chandler | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2024 |
| Peterson, Forrest | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Port, Barry | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/26/2018 |
| Sato, Ami | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/09/2024 |
All 14 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Ensign Group — 342 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- South Mountain Post Acute — Phoenix, AZ · overall 4/5
- Springdale Village Post Acute — Mesa, AZ · overall 3/5
- Sun West Choice Healthcare & Rehab — Sun City West, AZ · overall 5/5
- Sunview Respiratory and Rehabilitation — Youngtown, AZ · overall 2/5abuseSFF
- Surprise Health and Rehabilitation Center — Surprise, AZ · overall 5/5
- Tempe Post Acute — Tempe, AZ · overall 5/5
- Villa Maria Post Acute and Rehabilitation — Tucson, AZ · overall 3/5
- Wellsprings of Gilbert — Gilbert, AZ · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 341 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "What does the care plan for a brand-new resident cover in the first 48 hours, and who writes it?"
- "How do you help residents maintain their daily living skills, and how do you measure whether it's working?"
- "Can I see this month's activities calendar, and what do you offer residents who can't leave their rooms?"
- "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "What is your current policy for testing residents and staff when someone shows symptoms or there's an outbreak?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Arizona midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 48% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 14 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 53 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Life Care Center of Scottsdale | 0.2 mi | Scottsdale, AZ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Advance Health Care of Scottsdale | 0.8 mi | Scottsdale, AZ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Sante of North Scottsdale | 4.0 mi | Scottsdale, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Phoenix Mountain Post Acute | 5.9 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| VI at Grayhawk, a VI and Plaza Companies Community | 6.1 mi | Scottsdale, AZ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Arizona State Veteran Home-Phx | 6.3 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Heritage Court Post Acute of Scottsdale | 7.3 mi | Scottsdale, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Osborn Health and Rehabilitation | 7.3 mi | Scottsdale, AZ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Haven of Scottsdale | 7.4 mi | Scottsdale, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Ridgecrest Post Acute | 7.8 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Paradise Valley | 7.8 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Rehab at Scottsdale Village Square | 8.1 mi | Scottsdale, AZ | —/5 | abuseSFF |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Maricopa, AZ — 77 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- South Mountain Post Acute — Phoenix, AZ · overall 4/5
- Springdale Village Post Acute — Mesa, AZ · overall 3/5
- Sun City Post Acute — Sun City, AZ · overall 4/5
- Sun Health Grandview Care Center — Sun City West, AZ · overall 5/5
- Sun Health la Loma Care Center — Litchfield Park, AZ · overall 3/5
- Sun West Choice Healthcare & Rehab — Sun City West, AZ · overall 5/5
- Sunview Respiratory and Rehabilitation — Youngtown, AZ · overall 2/5abuseSFF
- Surprise Health and Rehabilitation Center — Surprise, AZ · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035105.