FloridaNaples

Bentley Care Center

875 Retreat Drive, Naples, FL 34110 · Collier County · 84 certified beds · avg 75 residents/day · certified since Dec 2, 2004

Part of chain: VI LIVING (9 facilities, chain avg rating 4.4★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
6.59
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (17)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Nov 21, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service.
Nov 21, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 21, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Nov 21, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Nov 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Mar 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 15).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202320D
2024150F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)6.594.033.95top 1% in Florida; top 2% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.940.760.69top 2% in Florida; top 2% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.963.683.50top 1% in Florida; top 2% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.360.530.48top 2% in Florida; top 2% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)31.141.445.8top 25% in Florida; top 16% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)43.946.042.9top 46% in Florida; bottom 46% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 6.45, RN 1.90, weekend 5.84. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Margot and Tom Pritzker FoundationOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10%05/22/2025
P. G. - Daniel TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest5%01/01/2012
P. G. - Don #3 TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest5%01/01/2012
P. G. - Jim TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest5%01/01/2012
P. G. - Johnny TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest5%01/01/2012
P. G. - Karen TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest9%01/01/2012
P. G. - Linda TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest5%01/01/2012
P. G. - Nicholas TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest6%01/01/2012
P. G. - Tony TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest5%01/01/2012
Pritzker Pucker Family Foundation No. 2Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest9%05/22/2025
Allison, PamelaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/21/2025
Allison, PamelaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/21/2025
Classic Residence Management Limited PartnershipOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/11/1990
Classic Residence Management Limited PartnershipOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/18/2025
Conzelman, TinaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/09/2025
Conzelman, TinaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/09/2025
Cope, TaraIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018
Cope, TaraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018
Elterman, FrankIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2023
Elterman, FrankIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Solaris Healthcare Imperial1.2 miNaples, FL★★★☆☆2/5
Solaris Senior Living North Naples2.9 miNaples, FL★★★☆☆2/5
Renaissance at the Terraces3.3 miBonita Springs, FL★★★★☆3/5
Adviniacare at Naples5.1 miNaples, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Premier Place at the Glenview6.1 miNaples, FL★★★★★5/5
Chateau at Moorings Park, the7.1 miNaples, FL★★★★★4/5
Life Care Center of Estero7.9 miEstero, FL★★★★★4/5
Naples Health and Rehabilitation Center8.7 miNaples, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Gardens at Terracina Health & Rehabilitation12.6 miNaples, FL★★★★★4/5
Woodside Health and Rehabilitation Center13.5 miNaples, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Naples →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 106062.