ArizonaGlendale

Agave Grove Post Acute

8641 North 67th Ave, Glendale, AZ 85302 · Maricopa County · 225 certified beds · avg 108 residents/day · certified since Apr 5, 1988 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.02
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (20)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 24, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
May 9, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
May 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
May 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
May 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Nov 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
May 12, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
May 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
May 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
May 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
May 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange specialized rehabilitation services — such as physical, occupational, or speech therapy — for residents who needed them.
May 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not educate its staff on residents' rights and the facility's responsibilities toward residents. Staff can only respect rights they've been taught about.
May 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
Apr 8, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs.
Apr 8, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202220E
202380E
202420D
202560E
202620D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityArizona avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.023.973.95top 34% in Arizona; top 39% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.570.690.69bottom 41% in Arizona; bottom 47% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.723.503.50top 28% in Arizona; top 32% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.400.490.48bottom 45% in Arizona; top 49% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)33.945.245.8top 15% in Arizona; top 22% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)50.043.642.9bottom 39% in Arizona; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.89, RN 0.55, weekend 3.60. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Bymark, DyanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/18/2021
Eckstein, CatherineIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/23/2021
Gould, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/19/2020
Hollrah, BrianIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/27/2021
Iverson, AshleyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/19/2020
Koch, StephenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/22/2019
McCammond, MichaelIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/29/2013
McClintock, ScottIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2015
Patterson, PeterIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/31/2018
Sanoh, BenduIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2021
Smith, JacquelynIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/22/2019
Thorhauer, JohnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2021
Whittaker, FlyodIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/26/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Horizon Post Acute and Rehabilitation Center2.3 miGlendale, AZ★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Life Care Center of North Glendale3.4 miGlendale, AZ★★★★★4/5
Bella Vita Health and Rehabilitation Center3.6 miGlendale, AZ★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Immanuel Campus of Care4.1 miPeoria, AZ★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Peoria Post Acute and Rehabilitation4.6 miPeoria, AZ★★★★☆4/5
Az - Rio Vista Post Acute and Rehabilitation4.6 miPeoria, AZ★★★★★4/5
Freedom Plaza Care Center4.7 miPeoria, AZ★★★★★5/5
Advanced Health Care of Glendale5.3 miGlendale, AZ★★★★★4/5
Center at Arrowhead, LLC5.6 miGlendale, AZ★★★★★4/5
Boswell Transitional Care of Cascadia6.0 miSun City, AZ★★★★★4/5
Beatitudes Campus6.0 miPhoenix, AZ★★★☆☆2/5
Coronado Healthcare Center6.1 miPhoenix, AZ★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Glendale →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035154.