LouisianaPineville

The Oaks Care Center

50 Pinecrest Drive, Pineville, LA 71360 · Rapides County · 136 certified beds · avg 106 residents/day · certified since Aug 30, 2001

Part of chain: PLANTATION MANAGEMENT COMPANY (16 facilities, chain avg rating 1.8★)

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.24
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (14)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 7, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Sep 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Sep 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Sep 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 24, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Aug 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Aug 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Aug 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Aug 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Aug 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Aug 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Aug 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (3 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202380E
202430E
202630E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityLouisiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.244.043.95bottom 15% in Louisiana; bottom 24% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.170.320.69bottom 19% in Louisiana; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.023.453.50bottom 29% in Louisiana; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.220.200.48top 19% in Louisiana; bottom 16% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)49.547.645.8bottom 41% in Louisiana; bottom 38% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.041.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.25, RN 0.17, weekend 3.03. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
QSST Trust for Gene Oliver Quirk IIIOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest16%01/01/2021
QSST Trust for Marshall Todd QuirkOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest16%01/01/2021
QSST Trust for Scott Holden QuirkOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest16%01/01/2021
Quirk, CynthiaIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest36%01/01/2021
Quirk, GeneIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest16%01/01/2021
David, LoraIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Delatte, KimberlyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/31/2001
Delatte, KimberlyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2020
Maxwell, PhillipIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE09/07/2016
Quirk, CynthiaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/31/2001
Quirk, GeneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/31/2001
Quirk, ScottIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/31/2001

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Hilltop Nursing & Rehabilitation Center1.8 miPineville, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Tioga Community Care Center2.6 miPineville, LA★★☆☆☆3/5
Legacy Nursing at St. Christina3.7 miPineville, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Matthews Memorial Health Care Center4.0 miAlexandria, LA★★☆☆☆2/5
Lexington House6.3 miAlexandria, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5
The Summit6.4 miAlexandria, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Regency House of Alexandria7.5 miAlexandria, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Belle Grande Nursing and Rehabilitation Center7.8 miAlexandria, LA★★★☆☆3/5
Legacy Nursing and Rehabilitation of Pollock10.3 miPollock, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Oak Haven Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center14.9 miCenter Point, LA★★☆☆☆1/5SFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Pineville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195529.