LouisianaPollock

Legacy Nursing and Rehabilitation of Pollock

8275 Highway 165, Pollock, LA 71467 · Grant County · 103 certified beds · avg 88 residents/day · certified since Feb 13, 1990

Part of chain: LEGACY NURSING & REHABILITATION (9 facilities, chain avg rating 1.2★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.59
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Oct 1, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Oct 1, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Oct 1, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Oct 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Oct 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Oct 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience.
Aug 25, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Nov 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Jul 24, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jul 24, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Jul 24, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jul 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jul 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Jul 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
May 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Feb 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
May 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
May 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330E
2024100E
2025120E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityLouisiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.594.043.95bottom 29% in Louisiana; bottom 41% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.200.320.69bottom 27% in Louisiana; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.943.453.50bottom 25% in Louisiana; bottom 28% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.100.200.48bottom 15% in Louisiana; bottom 1% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)53.947.645.8bottom 28% in Louisiana; bottom 27% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)50.041.642.9bottom 40% in Louisiana; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.55, RN 0.20, weekend 2.91. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Pollock Opco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/01/2024
Dgprejean, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Gum, JohnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Gum, VictorIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Gum, VictorIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Holyfield, MylesIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Jdgum, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
LP2 Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Mylesh, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Nugent, DebbieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Nugent, DebbieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Pollock Opco LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Pollock Opco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Prejean, DanielleIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Smith, BrianIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/12/2016
Smith, BrianIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/12/2016
VDG LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Tioga Community Care Center8.4 miPineville, LA★★☆☆☆3/5
The Oaks Care Center10.3 miPineville, LA★★★★☆5/5
Hilltop Nursing & Rehabilitation Center12.0 miPineville, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Matthews Memorial Health Care Center13.9 miAlexandria, LA★★☆☆☆2/5
Legacy Nursing at St. Christina14.0 miPineville, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Lexington House15.3 miAlexandria, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Colfax Nursing and Rehab, LLC16.3 miColfax, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Summit16.4 miAlexandria, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Belle Grande Nursing and Rehabilitation Center17.1 miAlexandria, LA★★★☆☆3/5
Regency House of Alexandria17.3 miAlexandria, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Lasalle Nursing Home19.5 miJena, LA★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Pollock →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195249.