LouisianaDenham Springs

Golden Age Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center

27090 Hwy 16, Denham Springs, LA 70726 · Livingston County · 175 certified beds · avg 171 residents/day · certified since Jun 27, 2001

Part of chain: PLANTATION MANAGEMENT COMPANY (16 facilities, chain avg rating 1.8★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$8,044
Fines, last 3 years
3.16
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 1, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 21, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (26)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 18, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 18, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Mar 18, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 18, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Mar 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Apr 1, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Feb 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Feb 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Feb 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Feb 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Feb 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · from a complaint
Feb 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Oct 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Oct 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Jun 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Mar 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Mar 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2024120E
202581G ▲
202660E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,044.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 1, 2025Fine$8,044

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityLouisiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.164.043.95bottom 12% in Louisiana; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.120.320.69bottom 6% in Louisiana; bottom 1% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.643.453.50bottom 10% in Louisiana; bottom 14% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.090.200.48bottom 9% in Louisiana; bottom 1% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)52.447.645.8bottom 31% in Louisiana; bottom 31% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)60.041.642.9bottom 27% in Louisiana; bottom 22% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.31, RN 0.12, weekend 2.76. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
QSST Trust for Gene Oliver Quirk IIIOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest16%01/01/2021
QSST Trust for Marshall Todd QuirkOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest16%01/01/2021
QSST Trust for Scott Holden QuirkOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest16%01/01/2021
Quirk, CynthiaIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest12/07/2009
Quirk, GeneIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest12/07/2009
D'arensbourg, JordanIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2017
Delatte, KimberlyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/07/2009
Quirk, CynthiaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/07/2009
Quirk, GeneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/07/2009
Quirk, ScottIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/07/2009

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Harvest Manor Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center11.7 miDenham Springs, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Central Guest House Healthcare & Rehabilitation Ce12.0 miBaton Rouge, LA★★★☆☆3/5
Zachary Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center14.2 miZachary, LA★★★☆☆3/5
The Lodge at Lane14.3 miZachary, LA★★★★★5/5
Grace Nursing Home15.2 miSlaughter, LA★★★☆☆3/5
Flannery Oaks Guest House15.5 miBaton Rouge, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Pines Retirement Center of Baton Rouge15.9 miBaton Rouge, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Woodleigh of Baton Rouge16.1 miBaton Rouge, LA★★★☆☆3/5
River Oaks Nursing & Rehabilitation Center LLC16.2 miBaker, LA★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Baton Rouge Health Care Center16.3 miBaton Rouge, LA★★★★★4/5
Capitol House Nursing and Rehab Center16.5 miBaton Rouge, LA★☆☆☆☆3/5
The Guest House Care Center17.1 miBaton Rouge, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Denham Springs →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195524.