Harvest Manor Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center
839 North Range Avenue, Denham Springs, LA 70726 · Livingston County · 171 certified beds · avg 165 residents/day · certified since Oct 13, 2000
Part of chain: PLANTATION MANAGEMENT COMPANY (16 facilities, chain avg rating 1.8★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Jul 11, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.
Corrected: Aug 18, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Jul 11, 2025 · F-0609 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Why it matters: When incidents aren't reported promptly, abusers may continue harming residents and outside authorities can't step in.
Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.
Corrected: Aug 18, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Jul 11, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.
Corrected: Aug 18, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Jul 11, 2025 · F-0835 · triggered by a complaint
The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.
Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.
Corrected: Aug 18, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Feb 26, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.
Corrected: Feb 21, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
All citations in the current public record (31)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Aug 13, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. |
| Aug 13, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. |
| Aug 13, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. |
| Aug 13, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. |
| Aug 13, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| Aug 13, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. |
| Aug 13, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. |
| Aug 13, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Aug 13, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Aug 13, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. · from a complaint |
| Aug 13, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. |
| Aug 13, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jul 11, 2025 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Jul 11, 2025 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint |
| Jul 11, 2025 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Jul 11, 2025 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeated | The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint |
| Jul 11, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them. · from a complaint |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint |
| Feb 26, 2025 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Jul 25, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Jul 25, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jul 25, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · from a complaint |
| Jul 25, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Oct 26, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Jun 22, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. |
| Jun 22, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. |
| Jun 22, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Jun 22, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Jun 22, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. |
| Jun 22, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 13).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 7 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 20 | 5 | K ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
2 fines totaling $304,311, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2025 | Fine | $289,410 |
| Jul 11, 2025 | Payment Denial | 17 days from Aug 19, 2025 |
| Feb 26, 2025 | Fine | $14,901 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Louisiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.32 | 4.04 | 3.95 | bottom 17% in Louisiana; bottom 27% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.19 | 0.32 | 0.69 | bottom 25% in Louisiana; bottom 2% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.90 | 3.45 | 3.50 | bottom 21% in Louisiana; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.08 | 0.20 | 0.48 | bottom 6% in Louisiana; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 44.2 | 47.6 | 45.8 | top 39% in Louisiana; top 48% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 28.6 | 41.6 | 42.9 | top 31% in Louisiana; top 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.35, RN 0.19, weekend 2.92. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QSST Trust for Gene Oliver Quirk III | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 16% | 01/01/2021 |
| QSST Trust for Marshall Todd Quirk | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 16% | 01/01/2021 |
| QSST Trust for Scott Holden Quirk | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 16% | 01/01/2021 |
| Quirk, Cynthia | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 10/13/2000 |
| Quirk, Gene | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 10/13/2000 |
| Delatte, Kimberly | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/13/2000 |
| Delatte, Kimberly | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2011 |
| Quirk, Cynthia | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/13/2000 |
| Quirk, Gene | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/13/2000 |
| Quirk, Scott | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/13/2000 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What were the findings behind this administration citation, and what has leadership changed since?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "How is pest control handled here, and when was the last treatment or inspection?"
- "Does your facility have an active resident council, and how does management respond to its concerns?"
- "How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pines Retirement Center of Baton Rouge | 4.9 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Flannery Oaks Guest House | 5.1 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Woodleigh of Baton Rouge | 5.2 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Capitol House Nursing and Rehab Center | 6.4 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Central Guest House Healthcare & Rehabilitation Ce | 6.8 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Guest House Care Center | 7.3 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| White Oak Post Acute Care | 7.5 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | —/5 | SFF | |
| Old Jefferson Community Care Center | 7.9 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Landmark of Baton Rouge | 9.0 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Heritage Manor of Baton Rouge II | 9.0 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Jefferson Manor Nursing and Rehab Ctr, LLC | 9.1 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| St Clare Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation | 9.6 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Denham Springs →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195501.