LouisianaBaton Rouge

Central Guest House Healthcare & Rehabilitation Ce

10748 Joor Road, Baton Rouge, LA 70818 · E. Baton Rouge County · 170 certified beds · avg 164 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1996

Part of chain: PLANTATION MANAGEMENT COMPANY (16 facilities, chain avg rating 1.8★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$26,790
Fines, last 3 years
3.18
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 21, 2024 · F-0658

The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.

Why it matters: Care that falls below professional standards can directly harm a resident's health and recovery.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Apr 12, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (27)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 21, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint
Mar 25, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 25, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 25, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 25, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Mar 25, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 12, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Feb 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 12, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Oct 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Oct 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · from a complaint
Mar 21, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Mar 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Mar 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Mar 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.
Mar 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Dec 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Dec 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Dec 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Dec 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202350E
2024101J ▲
202560E
202660E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $26,790.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 21, 2024Fine$26,790

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityLouisiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.184.043.95bottom 12% in Louisiana; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.190.320.69bottom 25% in Louisiana; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.753.453.50bottom 14% in Louisiana; bottom 19% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.070.200.48bottom 2% in Louisiana; bottom 1% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)49.347.645.8bottom 42% in Louisiana; bottom 39% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)20.041.642.9top 17% in Louisiana; top 13% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.29, RN 0.20, weekend 2.85. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
QSST Trust for Gene Oliver Quirk IIIOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest15%12/31/2012
QSST Trust for Marshall Todd QuirkOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest15%12/31/2012
QSST Trust for Scott Holden QuirkOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest15%12/31/2012
Quirk, CynthiaIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest28%12/31/2012
Quirk, GeneIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest28%12/31/2012
Delatte, KimberlyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2012
Quirk, GeneIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2012
Quirk, ScottIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2005

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Flannery Oaks Guest House5.6 miBaton Rouge, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Baton Rouge Health Care Center5.7 miBaton Rouge, LA★★★★★4/5
Capitol House Nursing and Rehab Center5.9 miBaton Rouge, LA★☆☆☆☆3/5
The Guest House Care Center6.1 miBaton Rouge, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Pines Retirement Center of Baton Rouge6.6 miBaton Rouge, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Woodleigh of Baton Rouge6.7 miBaton Rouge, LA★★★☆☆3/5
Harvest Manor Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center6.8 miDenham Springs, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5
St Clare Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation6.9 miBaton Rouge, LA★★★★☆4/5
River Oaks Nursing & Rehabilitation Center LLC7.2 miBaker, LA★★★☆☆2/5abuse
White Oak Post Acute Care8.2 miBaton Rouge, LA—/5SFF
Baton Rouge General Medical Center, SNF8.3 miBaton Rouge, LA★★★★★5/5
Capital Oaks Nursing & Rehabilitation Center LLC8.7 miBaton Rouge, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Baton Rouge →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195382.