172 Versailles Blvd, Alexandria, LA 71303 (opens Google Maps) · Rapides County · (318) 443-5638· 139 certified beds · avg 96 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 1997 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CENTRAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY (21 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Apr 9, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 27, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately. F-0576
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. F-0698
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately. · F-0576 |
| Sep 24, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Sep 24, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Sep 24, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Sep 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Sep 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726 |
| Sep 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Apr 9, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Apr 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Jul 31, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 31, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Jul 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jun 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jun 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 7).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 9 | 1 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $16,149.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2025 | Fine | $16,149 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Louisiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.83 | 4.04 | 3.95 | top 14% in Louisiana; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.48 | 0.32 | 0.69 | top 8% in Louisiana; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.02 | 3.45 | 3.50 | top 16% in Louisiana; top 22% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.30 | 0.20 | 0.48 | top 9% in Louisiana; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 44.7 | 47.6 | 45.8 | top 41% in Louisiana; top 49% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 30.0 | 41.6 | 42.9 | top 33% in Louisiana; top 29% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.61, RN 0.46, weekend 3.84.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.61 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Belle Grande Nursing and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kisatchie Health, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 58% | 01/01/2005 |
| Maumalanga, Holly | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 03/31/2025 |
| Price, Teddy | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/2025 |
| Price, Teddy | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2005 |
| Shelton, James | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 20% | 01/01/2005 |
| Zimmerman, Freda | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 7% | 03/31/2025 |
| Barton, Bruce | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/26/2025 |
| Bolwahnn, Sheila | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2008 |
| Cantrell, Jeffrey Lee | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2013 |
| Central Management Company, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2005 |
| Central Management Company, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/03/2025 |
| Kisatchie Health, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2001 |
| Maumalanga, Holly | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/2025 |
| Price, Teddy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2005 |
| Price, Teddy | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/16/2026 |
| Price, Teddy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2001 |
| Rogers, Dawn | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2005 |
| Shelton, James | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2005 |
| Shelton, James | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2005 |
| Wall, Theresa J | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/26/2025 |
Showing 20 of 21 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 1 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Central Management Company — 21 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 20 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regency House of Alexandria | 1.5 mi | Alexandria, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Lexington House | 1.7 mi | Alexandria, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Summit | 2.3 mi | Alexandria, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Matthews Memorial Health Care Center | 3.9 mi | Alexandria, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Legacy Nursing at St. Christina | 5.5 mi | Pineville, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Hilltop Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 7.0 mi | Pineville, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| The Oaks Care Center | 7.8 mi | Pineville, LA | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Tioga Community Care Center | 8.7 mi | Pineville, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Legacy Nursing and Rehabilitation of Pollock | 17.1 mi | Pollock, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Oak Haven Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 17.9 mi | Center Point, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195420.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details