Oak Haven Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
1515 Highway 107, Center Point, LA 71323 · Avoyelles County · 104 certified beds · avg 93 residents/day · certified since May 1, 2003
SFF Candidate
Part of chain: VENZA CARE MANAGEMENT (25 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Apr 16, 2026 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.
Corrected: Apr 20, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Apr 16, 2026 · F-0726
The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Why it matters: Undertrained caregivers are more likely to miss warning signs and make care mistakes.
Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.
Corrected: Apr 20, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Apr 16, 2026 · F-0835
The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.
Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.
Corrected: Apr 20, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 21, 2024 · F-0678
The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.
Why it matters: In a cardiac or breathing emergency, failure to start CPR promptly can be the difference between life and death.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Apr 16, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 5, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Dec 30, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (37)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2026 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Apr 16, 2026 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. |
| Apr 16, 2026 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeated | The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. |
| Apr 16, 2026 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. |
| Apr 16, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. |
| Apr 16, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Dec 3, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service. · from a complaint |
| Dec 3, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint |
| Dec 3, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint |
| Dec 3, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint |
| May 7, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. |
| May 7, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Feb 5, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint |
| Feb 5, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint |
| Feb 5, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| Dec 5, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Dec 5, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint |
| Mar 21, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. |
| Mar 21, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Mar 21, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. |
| Mar 21, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Mar 21, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. |
| Mar 21, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Mar 21, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Feb 21, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint |
| Feb 21, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (13 → 6).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11 | 2 | J ▲ |
| 2025 | 20 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 6 | 3 | K ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
3 fines totaling $44,606.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2024 | Fine | $11,004 |
| Mar 21, 2024 | Fine | $16,801 |
| Mar 21, 2024 | Fine | $16,801 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Louisiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.82 | 4.04 | 3.95 | bottom 41% in Louisiana; top 47% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.69 | top 35% in Louisiana; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.28 | 3.45 | 3.50 | bottom 41% in Louisiana; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.09 | 0.20 | 0.48 | bottom 13% in Louisiana; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 46.8 | 47.6 | 45.8 | top 49% in Louisiana; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 14.3 | 41.6 | 42.9 | top 11% in Louisiana; top 7% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.86, RN 0.32, weekend 3.31. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH La2 Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 22% | 12/28/2023 |
| CW La2 Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 22% | 12/28/2023 |
| La2 SNF Operations Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 12/28/2023 |
| Ms La2 Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 25% | 12/28/2023 |
| SE SNF Associates LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/25/2026 |
| SE SNF Associates Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/25/2026 |
| SE SNF Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/25/2026 |
| SE SNF Holdings Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/25/2026 |
| SS La2 Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 25% | 12/28/2023 |
| Aziz, Mohammed | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/28/2023 |
| Aziz, Mohammed | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/28/2023 |
| Goodman, Menucha | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| Goodman, Menucha | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| Goodman, Menucha | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| Herzka, Yisroel | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/12/2026 |
| Howell, Christie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2025 |
| Howell, Christie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2025 |
| La2 Opco Manager LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/28/2023 |
| Melb Opco Manager LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| Melb Opco Manager LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/29/2025 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you verify that your nurses and aides have the skills to care for residents with needs like my family member's?"
- "What were the findings behind this administration citation, and what has leadership changed since?"
- "Are staff on every shift trained and certified in CPR, and how do they know each resident's resuscitation wishes?"
- "Where do you post your daily staffing numbers, and can I see today's?"
- "Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "How is your kitchen staffed, and have meals ever been delayed because of staffing?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Valley View Health Care Facility | 10.4 mi | Marksville, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Colonial Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 11.5 mi | Marksville, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Riviere de Soleil Community Care Center | 13.4 mi | Mansura, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Legacy Nursing at St. Christina | 13.5 mi | Pineville, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Hilltop Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 13.6 mi | Pineville, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Hessmer Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 13.9 mi | Hessmer, LA | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| The Oaks Care Center | 14.9 mi | Pineville, LA | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Matthews Memorial Health Care Center | 15.4 mi | Alexandria, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Summit | 15.7 mi | Alexandria, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Regency House of Alexandria | 16.5 mi | Alexandria, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Center Point →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195575.