New YorkBronx

Bronx Gardens Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

2175 Quarry Road, Bronx, NY 10457 · Bronx County · 199 certified beds · avg 193 residents/day · certified since May 2, 1994

Part of chain: CITADEL CARE CENTERS (5 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.91
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 9, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 5, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (13)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 9, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 24, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jun 24, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jun 24, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Jun 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jun 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Mar 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Apr 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Apr 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Apr 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Sep 30, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202010D
202350D
202571G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew York avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.913.583.95bottom 19% in New York; bottom 11% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.940.680.69top 13% in New York; top 19% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.743.133.50bottom 33% in New York; bottom 18% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.910.480.48top 8% in New York; top 8% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)37.040.345.8top 46% in New York; top 29% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)32.739.842.9top 37% in New York; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.63, RN 1.17, weekend 3.41. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Farkowitz, EstherIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest25%03/12/2015
Friedman, LeopoldIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%03/12/2015
Philipson, AviIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest25%03/12/2015
Farkowitz, EstherIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/20/2016
Friedman, LeopoldIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/20/2016
Friedman, LeopoldIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/20/2016
Terrano, MonicaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2016
Terrano, MonicaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2016

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Casa Promesa0.9 miBronx, NY★★★☆☆2/5
University Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing1.0 miBronx, NY★★★★☆4/5
The Plaza Rehab and Nursing Center1.2 miBronx, NY★★★★★4/5
Fordham Nursing and Rehabilitation Center1.4 miBronx, NY★★★☆☆3/5
Morningside Nursing and Rehabilitation Center1.6 miBronx, NY★★★★★4/5
Bronxcare Special Care Center1.6 miBronx, NY★★★★☆4/5
Beth Abraham Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing1.7 miBronx, NY★★★☆☆2/5
Triboro Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing1.8 miBronx, NY★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Pelham Parkway Nursing Care and Rehabilitation Fac1.9 miBronx, NY★★★★☆3/5
Mosholu Parkway Nursing & Rehabilitation Center1.9 miBronx, NY★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Bronx →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335775.