New YorkBronx

Bronx Center for Rehabilitation & Health Care

1010 Underhill Avenue, Bronx, NY 10472 · Bronx County · 200 certified beds · avg 197 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1977

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: CENTERS HEALTH CARE (36 facilities, chain avg rating 2.2★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.37
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 2, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 3, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 2, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Dec 22, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Dec 22, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 22, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 22, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Dec 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Dec 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Dec 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Dec 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Dec 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit.
Dec 22, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Dec 22, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Jul 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jul 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit.
Jul 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jul 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
May 20, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
May 20, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 11).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202120E
202340D
2025110E
202611G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew York avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.373.583.95bottom 48% in New York; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.290.680.69bottom 2% in New York; bottom 9% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.023.133.50top 48% in New York; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.170.480.48bottom 7% in New York; bottom 8% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)17.040.345.8top 3% in New York; top 2% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)25.039.842.9top 19% in New York; top 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.46, RN 0.30, weekend 3.09. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Rozenberg, BethIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest5%09/10/2013
Rozenberg, KennethIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest95%12/31/2002
Rozenberg, KennethIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2002
Sicklick, JeffreyIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE09/29/1997

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Grand Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center0.5 miBronx, NY—/5abuseSFF
Rebekah Rehabilitation and Extended Care Center0.7 miBronx, NY★★★★☆3/5
Williamsbridge Center for Rehabilitation and Nrsg1.5 miBronx, NY★★★★☆3/5
Throgs Neck Rehabilitation & Nursing Center1.8 miBronx, NY★★★☆☆3/5
St Vincent Depaul Residence1.9 miBronx, NY★★★☆☆2/5
Morningside Nursing and Rehabilitation Center2.1 miBronx, NY★★★★★4/5
Morris Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center2.3 miBronx, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5
Bronxcare Special Care Center2.3 miBronx, NY★★★★☆4/5
Archcare at Providence Rest2.3 miBronx, NY★★★★★5/5
Bronx Gardens Rehabilitation and Nursing Center2.4 miBronx, NY★★★☆☆2/5
Pelham Parkway Nursing Care and Rehabilitation Fac2.4 miBronx, NY★★★★☆3/5
East Haven Nursing & Rehabilitation Center2.5 miBronx, NY★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Bronx →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335506.