How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
707 Throgs Neck Expressway, Bronx, NY 10465 (opens Google Maps) · Bronx County · (718) 430-0003· 205 certified beds · avg 195 residents/day · certified since Dec 31, 1993 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: EXCELSIOR CARE GROUP (33 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint F-0609
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint F-0842
The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · from a complaint F-0851
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Mar 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Jan 7, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · from a complaint · F-0851 |
| Dec 1, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Sep 10, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Sep 10, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Sep 10, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Sep 10, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Sep 10, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Sep 10, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Sep 10, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Sep 10, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. · F-0711 |
| Sep 10, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Sep 10, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 22, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts. · F-0568 |
| Feb 22, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 1).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2021 | 10 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.88 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 18% in New York; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.49 | 0.68 | 0.69 | bottom 34% in New York; bottom 37% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.57 | 3.13 | 3.50 | bottom 21% in New York; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.35 | 0.48 | 0.48 | bottom 49% in New York; bottom 43% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | — | 40.3 | 45.8 | — |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 39.8 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.91, RN 0.50, weekend 2.59.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (2.91 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Throgs Neck Rehabilitation & Nursing Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Becher, Aaron | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2025 |
| Bloom, David | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2025 |
| Busell, Sandra | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2025 |
| Chopp, Alan | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2025 |
| Estate of Mayer Rispler | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2025 |
| Excelsior Care Group | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/21/2019 |
| Farkowitz, Esther | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 7% | 01/01/2025 |
| George Klein Testamentary Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2025 |
| Klein, Larry | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2025 |
| Leifer, Joel | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 44% | 01/01/2025 |
| Lerner, Chana | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2025 |
| Nakdimen, Shelly | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2025 |
| Philipson, Bent | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2025 |
| Pocchia, Teresa | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2025 |
| Pollak, Theodore | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2025 |
| Schwartz, Michael | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2025 |
| Singer, Brucha | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2025 |
| Stern, Ronald | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2025 |
| Tessler, Naomi | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2025 |
| Brown-Whittingham, Andrea | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/16/2022 |
Showing 20 of 36 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 16 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Excelsior Care Group — 33 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 32 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Archcare at Providence Rest | 1.0 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Rebekah Rehabilitation and Extended Care Center | 1.3 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Grand Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 1.7 mi | Bronx, NY | —/5 | abuseSFF | |
| Bronx Center for Rehabilitation & Health Care | 1.8 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Williamsbridge Center for Rehabilitation and Nrsg | 2.0 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Gold Crest Care Center | 2.5 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Kings Harbor Multicare Cente | 2.6 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| East Haven Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 2.7 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Morris Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 2.8 mi | Bronx, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Bridge View Nursing Home | 2.8 mi | Whitestone, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Morningside Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 2.9 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Eastchester Rehabilitation and Health Care Center | 3.0 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Bronx, NY — 44 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335771.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details