40 Julio Drive, Shrewsbury, MA 01545 (opens Google Maps) · Worcester County · (508) 841-4755· 99 certified beds · avg 90 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1990 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: ATLAS HEALTHCARE (29 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Sep 19, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Oct 20, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. F-0814
The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. F-0755
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Mar 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Mar 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Nov 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Nov 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Nov 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Nov 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Nov 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Nov 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Nov 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Nov 27, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Nov 27, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not notify the appropriate authorities when a resident with a mental disorder or intellectual disability had a significant change in condition. · F-0646 |
| Dec 6, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Sep 19, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Sep 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Sep 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Aug 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 5 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 8 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $7,901.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2023 | Fine | $7,901 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Massachusetts avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.65 | 3.89 | 3.95 | bottom 43% in Massachusetts; bottom 44% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.69 | top 46% in Massachusetts; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.32 | 3.51 | 3.50 | bottom 44% in Massachusetts; bottom 48% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.56 | 0.46 | 0.48 | top 23% in Massachusetts; top 27% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 54.5 | 38.2 | 45.8 | bottom 10% in Massachusetts; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 56.3 | 42.6 | 42.9 | bottom 24% in Massachusetts; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.15, RN 0.70, weekend 3.77.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.15 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Shrewsbury Rehabilitation and Nursing at Southgate. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Herzka, David | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/07/2024 |
| JMH Family LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/07/2024 |
| JMH Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/07/2024 |
| Levy, Michael | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/07/2024 |
| MLS Family LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/07/2024 |
| MLS Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/07/2024 |
| SGS Family LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/07/2024 |
| SGS Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/07/2024 |
| Shrewsbury Operations Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 05/07/2024 |
| Demma, Heather | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/07/2024 |
| Levy, Michael | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/07/2024 |
| Sheikh, Zahra | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/07/2024 |
All 12 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Atlas Healthcare — 29 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 28 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beaumont Rehab & Skilled Nursing Ctr - Northboro | 2.8 mi | Northborough, MA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Notre Dame Long Term Care Center | 3.0 mi | Worcester, MA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Alliance Health at Coleman | 3.3 mi | Northborough, MA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Regalcare at Worcester | 3.3 mi | Worcester, MA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Knollwood Nursing Center | 4.0 mi | Worcester, MA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Christopher House of Worcester | 4.1 mi | Worcester, MA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| St Francis Rehabilitation & Nursing Center | 4.7 mi | Worcester, MA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Holy Trinity Eastern Orthodox N & R Center | 4.8 mi | Worcester, MA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Odd Fellows Home of Massachusetts | 4.8 mi | Worcester, MA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Westborough Healthcare | 4.9 mi | Westborough, MA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Beaumont Rehab & Skilled Nursing Ctr - Westboro | 5.0 mi | Westborough, MA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Vantage at Worcester LLC | 5.1 mi | Worcester, MA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Worcester, MA — 50 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225491.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details