How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Atlas Rehabilitation & Healthcare at West Deptfor
550 Jessup Road, West Deptford, NJ 08066 (opens Google Maps) · Gloucester County · (856) 848-9551· 156 certified beds · avg 148 residents/day · certified since Jun 30, 1987 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: ATLAS HEALTHCARE (29 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Dec 10, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.54
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 20 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. F-0607
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. F-0636
View all 20 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
| Dec 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Dec 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Dec 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Dec 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Dec 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Jun 16, 2025 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint · F-0585 |
| Jul 9, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Jul 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Nov 1, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Nov 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Nov 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Nov 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Nov 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Nov 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Nov 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 7).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 9 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew Jersey averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.54
New Jersey average: 3.88
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.47
New Jersey average: 0.67
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.27
New Jersey average: 3.53
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.54 | 3.88 | 3.95 | bottom 43% in New Jersey; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.47 | 0.67 | 0.69 | bottom 35% in New Jersey; bottom 33% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.27 | 3.53 | 3.50 | bottom 48% in New Jersey; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.41 | 0.50 | 0.48 | top 48% in New Jersey; top 47% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 51.3 | 39.7 | 45.8 | bottom 19% in New Jersey; bottom 34% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 44.4 | 37.7 | 42.9 | bottom 33% in New Jersey; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.64, RN 0.48, weekend 3.36.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.64 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Atlas Rehabilitation & Healthcare at West Deptfor. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Herzka, David | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/23/2023 |
| JMH Family LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/23/2023 |
| JMH Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/23/2023 |
| MLS Family LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/23/2023 |
| MLS Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/23/2023 |
| SGS Family LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/23/2023 |
| SGS Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/23/2023 |
| WDS SNF Operations Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/23/2023 |
| Bak, Pinchos | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/23/2023 |
| Bak, Pinchos | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/23/2023 |
| Bak, Pinchos | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/23/2023 |
| Conti, Joseph | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/23/2023 |
| Conti, Joseph | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/23/2023 |
| Goldberger, Shlomo | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/23/2023 |
| Goldberger, Shlomo | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/23/2023 |
| Herzka, David | Individual | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/23/2023 |
| JMH Family LLC | Organization | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/23/2023 |
| JMH Family Trust | Organization | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/23/2023 |
| Malt Family Trust | Organization | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/23/2023 |
| MLS Family LLC | Organization | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/23/2023 |
Showing 20 of 35 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 15 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Atlas Healthcare — 29 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Atlas Rehabilitation and Healthcare at Daughters O — Clifton, NJ · overall 3/5
- Atlas Rehabilitation and Healthcare at Maywood — Maywood, NJ · overall 4/5
- Atlas Rehabilitation and Healthcare at Washington — Sewell, NJ · overall 3/5
- Birchwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Cranford, NJ · overall 5/5
- Cedar Grove Respiratory and Nursing Center — Williamstown, NJ · overall 4/5
- Meadowbrook Respiratory and Nursing Center — Matawan, NJ · overall 4/5
- Mystic Meadows Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — Little Egg Harbor TW, NJ · overall 4/5
- The Elms Rehab and Healthcare Center of Cranbury — Cranbury, NJ · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 28 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "How soon after admission is a full assessment completed, and how are the findings shared with the family?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New Jersey midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 51% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 35 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 139 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shady Lane Gloucester Co Home | 2.2 mi | Clarksboro, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Atlas Post Acute at Woodbury Country Club | 5.1 mi | Woodbury, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Aventura at Prospect | 5.3 mi | Prospect Park, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Advanced Subacute Rehabilitation Center at Sewell | 6.3 mi | Sewell, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Little Flower Manor | 6.5 mi | Darby, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Deptford Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare | 6.9 mi | Deptford, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| St Francis Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare | 6.9 mi | Darby, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Providence Rehab and Hlthcare Ctratmercyfitzgerald | 7.3 mi | Yeadon, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Belvedere Center, Genesis Healthcare, the | 7.3 mi | Chester, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| St Monica Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare | 7.7 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Edenbrook of Yeadon | 7.7 mi | Yeadon, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Fox Subacute at South Philadelphia | 7.8 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Gloucester, NJ — 9 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Atlas Rehabilitation and Healthcare at Washington — Sewell, NJ · overall 3/5
- Cedar Grove Respiratory and Nursing Center — Williamstown, NJ · overall 4/5
- The Center for Rehab & Nursing Washington Township — Sewell, NJ · overall 3/5
- United Methodist Communities at Pitman — Pitman, NJ · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315246.