Louisiana ›Springhill

Timber Springs Rehab and Retirement

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

215 First Street N E, Springhill, LA 71075 (opens Google Maps) · Webster County · (318) 588-8871· 153 certified beds · avg 51 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1996 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: PRIORITY MANAGEMENT (38 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Mar 25, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.92
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 12 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. F-0644

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. F-0657

  3. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656

View all 12 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 25, 2026E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644
Mar 25, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
Jan 15, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Jan 15, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700
Jan 15, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636
Jan 15, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · F-0685
Jan 15, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Dec 6, 2023E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578
Dec 6, 2023E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655
Dec 6, 2023E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
Dec 6, 2023E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758
Sep 20, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 2).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202350E
202550E
202620E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityLouisiana averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.92
Louisiana average: 4.04
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.18
Louisiana average: 0.32
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.57
Louisiana average: 3.45
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityLouisiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.924.043.95bottom 6% in Louisiana; bottom 11% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.180.320.69bottom 21% in Louisiana; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.573.453.50bottom 9% in Louisiana; bottom 11% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.180.200.48top 32% in Louisiana; bottom 8% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)—47.645.8—
RN turnover (%)—41.642.9—

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.14, RN 0.20, weekend 2.77.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.14 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Timber Springs Rehab and Retirement. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Bauder Family Investments, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest33%04/01/2025
Bauder, KellyIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest8%04/01/2025
Bauder, MadisonIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest8%04/01/2025
Bauder, ParkerIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest8%04/01/2025
Boulware St James LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest33%04/01/2025
Boulware, DouglasIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Boulware, ThomasIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest8%04/01/2025
Steven Boulware Family Investments LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest33%04/01/2025
Walker, KatieIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest8%04/01/2025
Bauder Family Investments, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Bauder, KellyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Bauder, MadisonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Bauder, ParkerIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Bauder, WilliamIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Boulware St James LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Boulware, DouglasIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Boulware, StevenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Boulware, StevenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Boulware, StevenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Boulware, ThomasIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025

Showing 20 of 32 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 12 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Priority Management — 38 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 37 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
  • "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
  • "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
  • "What alternatives do you try before using bed rails, and how do you involve families in that decision?"
  • "How soon after admission is a full assessment completed, and how are the findings shared with the family?"
  • "How do you arrange eye and hearing care for residents, including appointments and equipment like glasses or hearing aids?"
  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Louisiana midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 32 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Summit Health & Rehab Center7.1 miTaylor, AR★★★★★5/5
Heritage Nursing Center18.9 miHaynesville, LA★★★☆☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 2 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Webster, LA — 3 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Springhill →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195353.

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details