How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
65 East University Avenue, Tempe, AZ 85281 (opens Google Maps) · Maricopa County · (602) 777-7701· 21 certified beds · avg 17 residents/day · certified since Sep 9, 2021 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PACIFIC RETIREMENT SERVICES (10 facilities, chain avg rating 4.6★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 11 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. F-0578
The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. F-0756
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Aug 8, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Aug 8, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Aug 8, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 8, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · F-0605 |
| Aug 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Nov 29, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Oct 13, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Oct 13, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Oct 13, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · F-0622 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 6).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Arizona avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 8.19 | 3.97 | 3.95 | top 1% in Arizona; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 2.41 | 0.69 | 0.69 | top 1% in Arizona; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 6.99 | 3.50 | 3.50 | top 1% in Arizona; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.23 | 0.49 | 0.48 | top 3% in Arizona; top 3% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 61.5 | 45.2 | 45.8 | bottom 8% in Arizona; bottom 14% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 58.3 | 43.6 | 42.9 | bottom 22% in Arizona; bottom 24% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 7.02, RN 2.07, weekend 6.00.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (7.02 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Mirabella at Asu. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desanto, Virginia | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/21/2016 |
| Dillon, Daniel | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/29/2020 |
| Dorough, Thomas | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2020 |
| Jolly, Edward | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/21/2016 |
| Mayers, Robert | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/28/2019 |
| Pacific Retirement Services INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2020 |
| Sholty, Eric | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/23/2020 |
| Washington Federal | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2016 |
| Wilson, Doug | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/21/2016 |
All 9 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Pacific Retirement Services — 10 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 9 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plaza Healthcare | 3.7 mi | Scottsdale, AZ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Tempe Post Acute | 3.8 mi | Tempe, AZ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Rehab at Scottsdale Village Square | 3.9 mi | Scottsdale, AZ | —/5 | abuseSFF | |
| Friendship Village of Tempe | 4.0 mi | Tempe, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Haven of Scottsdale | 4.5 mi | Scottsdale, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Osborn Health and Rehabilitation | 4.6 mi | Scottsdale, AZ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Heritage Court Post Acute of Scottsdale | 4.6 mi | Scottsdale, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Resolve Harmony Center, LLC | 5.6 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Sandridge Post Acute | 5.8 mi | Mesa, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| River Park Post Acute | 6.1 mi | Chandler, AZ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Haven Health Sky Harbor, LLC | 6.1 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Desert Haven Care Center | 6.1 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Maricopa, AZ — 77 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035300.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details