Arizona ›Chandler

River Park Post Acute

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

2555 North Price Road, Chandler, AZ 85224 (opens Google Maps) · Maricopa County · (480) 345-8500· 66 certified beds · avg 63 residents/day · certified since Nov 6, 1998 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Apr 11, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Dec 29, 2022
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.61
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Dec 29, 2022 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Apr 26, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 11 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. F-0561

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. F-0565

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600

View all 11 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 11, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561
Apr 11, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. · F-0565
Apr 11, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600
Apr 11, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697
Apr 11, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · F-0770
Dec 29, 2022▲ G · Actual harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Dec 29, 2022E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not perform required COVID-19 testing on residents and staff. · F-0886
Dec 29, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609
Dec 29, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655
Dec 29, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Dec 29, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. · F-0947

Inspection trend by year

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2025
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202261G ▲
202550D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityArizona averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.61
Arizona average: 3.97
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.60
Arizona average: 0.69
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.19
Arizona average: 3.50
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityArizona avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.613.973.95bottom 46% in Arizona; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.600.690.69top 47% in Arizona; top 48% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.193.503.50bottom 46% in Arizona; bottom 41% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.490.490.48top 35% in Arizona; top 34% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)53.145.245.8bottom 23% in Arizona; bottom 29% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)58.343.642.9bottom 22% in Arizona; bottom 24% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.65, RN 0.61, weekend 3.22.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.65 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for River Park Post Acute. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Bandera Healthcare LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/13/2024
Nursa INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024
Bing Health Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024
Burnam, SoonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024
Ensign Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024
Keetch, ChadIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2026
Peterson, ForrestIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2022
Peterson, ForrestIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024
Peterson, ForrestIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/28/2025
Port, BarryIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/16/2026
Standard Bearer Healthcare Op, LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024
The Ensign Group INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024
Uy, MariettaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024
Uy, MariettaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024
Uy, MariettaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024

All 15 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain The Ensign Group — 342 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 341 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "What choices do residents have over their daily schedule, like meal times, bathing, and activities?"
  • "Does your facility have an active resident council, and how does management respond to its concerns?"
  • "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
  • "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
  • "How quickly are lab tests done and results acted on when a resident's doctor orders them?"
  • "What is your current policy for testing residents and staff when someone shows symptoms or there's an outbreak?"
  • "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Arizona midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 53% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 15 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 45 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Tempe Post Acute2.8 miTempe, AZ★★★★★5/5
Chandler Post Acute and Rehabilitation3.3 miChandler, AZ★★★★☆3/5
Desert Cove Nursing Center3.3 miChandler, AZ★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Friendship Village of Tempe3.4 miTempe, AZ★★★☆☆4/5
Sante of Chandler3.6 miChandler, AZ★★★★★4/5
Archstone Care Center3.7 miChandler, AZ★★★★★4/5
Mirabella at Asu6.1 miTempe, AZ★★★☆☆3/5
Ahwatukee Post Acute6.4 miPhoenix, AZ★★★☆☆3/5
Sandridge Post Acute6.9 miMesa, AZ★★★☆☆2/5
Plaza Healthcare8.3 miScottsdale, AZ★★★★★5/5
Citrus Heights Respiratory and Rehabilitation8.7 miMesa, AZ★★★☆☆2/5
Resolve Harmony Center, LLC8.8 miPhoenix, AZ★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Maricopa, AZ — 77 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Chandler →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035251.

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details