How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
2555 North Price Road, Chandler, AZ 85224 (opens Google Maps) · Maricopa County · (480) 345-8500· 66 certified beds · avg 63 residents/day · certified since Nov 6, 1998 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Dec 29, 2022 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 26, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 11 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. F-0561
The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. F-0565
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Apr 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. · F-0565 |
| Apr 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Apr 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Apr 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · F-0770 |
| Dec 29, 2022 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Dec 29, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not perform required COVID-19 testing on residents and staff. · F-0886 |
| Dec 29, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Dec 29, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Dec 29, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 29, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. · F-0947 |
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 6 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Arizona avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.61 | 3.97 | 3.95 | bottom 46% in Arizona; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.60 | 0.69 | 0.69 | top 47% in Arizona; top 48% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.19 | 3.50 | 3.50 | bottom 46% in Arizona; bottom 41% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.48 | top 35% in Arizona; top 34% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 53.1 | 45.2 | 45.8 | bottom 23% in Arizona; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 58.3 | 43.6 | 42.9 | bottom 22% in Arizona; bottom 24% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.65, RN 0.61, weekend 3.22.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.65 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for River Park Post Acute. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bandera Healthcare LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/13/2024 |
| Nursa INC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2024 |
| Bing Health Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2024 |
| Burnam, Soon | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2024 |
| Ensign Services INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2024 |
| Keetch, Chad | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/26/2026 |
| Peterson, Forrest | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2022 |
| Peterson, Forrest | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2024 |
| Peterson, Forrest | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/28/2025 |
| Port, Barry | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/16/2026 |
| Standard Bearer Healthcare Op, LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2024 |
| The Ensign Group INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2024 |
| Uy, Marietta | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2024 |
| Uy, Marietta | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2024 |
| Uy, Marietta | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2024 |
All 15 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Ensign Group — 342 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 341 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tempe Post Acute | 2.8 mi | Tempe, AZ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Chandler Post Acute and Rehabilitation | 3.3 mi | Chandler, AZ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Desert Cove Nursing Center | 3.3 mi | Chandler, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Friendship Village of Tempe | 3.4 mi | Tempe, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Sante of Chandler | 3.6 mi | Chandler, AZ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Archstone Care Center | 3.7 mi | Chandler, AZ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Mirabella at Asu | 6.1 mi | Tempe, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Ahwatukee Post Acute | 6.4 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Sandridge Post Acute | 6.9 mi | Mesa, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Plaza Healthcare | 8.3 mi | Scottsdale, AZ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Citrus Heights Respiratory and Rehabilitation | 8.7 mi | Mesa, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Resolve Harmony Center, LLC | 8.8 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Maricopa, AZ — 77 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035251.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details