How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Marquis Vermont Hills
6010 SW Shattuck Road, Portland, OR 97221 (opens Google Maps) · Multnomah County · (503) 246-8811· 73 certified beds · avg 49 residents/day · certified since Apr 19, 1990 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: MARQUIS COMPANIES (15 facilities, chain avg rating 4.3★)
5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 22, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.53
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 13 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. F-0657
View all 13 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Dec 19, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Dec 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Dec 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Jan 12, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Jan 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Jan 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jan 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jan 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Jan 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule. · F-0712 |
| Jan 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange specialized rehabilitation services — such as physical, occupational, or speech therapy — for residents who needed them. · F-0825 |
| Jan 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 1).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2024
All citations: 12
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityOregon averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 5.53
Oregon average: 5.42
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.79
Oregon average: 0.78
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.87
Oregon average: 4.85
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Oregon avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.53 | 5.42 | 3.95 | top 36% in Oregon; top 7% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.69 | top 33% in Oregon; top 28% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.87 | 4.85 | 3.50 | top 43% in Oregon; top 7% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.27 | 0.48 | 0.48 | bottom 19% in Oregon; bottom 27% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 36.0 | 47.4 | 45.8 | top 21% in Oregon; top 26% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 30.0 | 51.6 | 42.9 | top 17% in Oregon; top 29% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.13, RN 0.74, weekend 4.51.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.13 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Marquis Vermont Hills. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fogg, Phillip | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2004 |
| Marquis Companies I, INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2004 |
| Bucher, Amy | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2008 |
| Bucher, Amy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2008 |
| Fogg, Phillip | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2004 |
| Fogg, Phillip | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2004 |
| Fogg, Steven | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2004 |
| Fogg, Steven | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2004 |
| Fogg, Steven | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2004 |
| Tone, Staci | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2004 |
All 10 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Marquis Companies — 15 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Marquis Wilsonville Post Acute Rehab — Wilsonville, OR · overall 5/5
- Marquis Care at Shasta — Redding, CA · overall 2/5
- Marquis Care at Centennial Hills — Las Vegas, NV · overall 4/5
- Marquis Plaza Regency Post Acute Rehab — Las Vegas, NV · overall 4/5
- Marquis Centennial Post Acute Rehab — Portland, OR · overall 5/5
- Marquis Forest Grove Post Acute Rehab — Forest Grove, OR · overall 5/5
- Marquis Hope Village — Canby, OR · overall 4/5
- Marquis Mill Park — Portland, OR · overall 3/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 14 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "Can I see where garbage is stored and how often it's removed?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "Before any service that isn't covered by Medicare or Medicaid, how will you notify us and get our agreement?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 36% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 62 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robison Jewish Health Center | 0.3 mi | Portland, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Marquis Autumn Hills Memory Care | 0.4 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| West Hills Health & Rehabilitation | 1.0 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Avamere Crestview of Portland | 1.5 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Beaverton Post Acute Care of Cascadia | 2.9 mi | Beaverton, OR | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Mirabella Portland | 3.6 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Maryville | 4.4 mi | Beaverton, OR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Pearl at Kruse Way | 4.4 mi | Lake Oswego, OR | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Tigard Rehabilitation and Care | 5.0 mi | Tigard, OR | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| The Creston Health & Rehabilitation | 5.4 mi | Portland, OR | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Reedwood Post Acute | 5.4 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Holladay Park Plaza | 5.6 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Multnomah, OR — 33 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Menlo Park Post Acute — Portland, OR · overall 2/5
- Mt. Tabor Health & Rehabilitation — Portland, OR · overall 2/5
- Porthaven Post Acute — Portland, OR · overall 3/5
- Portland Health and Rehabilitation — Portland, OR · overall 1/5
- Providence Child Center — Portland, OR · overall 5/5
- Regency Gresham Nursing & Rehabilitation Center — Gresham, OR · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 385218.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).