NevadaLas Vegas

Marquis Plaza Regency Post Acute Rehab

6021 W. Cheyenne Ave., Las Vegas, NV 89108 · Clark County · 188 certified beds · avg 149 residents/day · certified since Jun 18, 1999

Part of chain: MARQUIS COMPANIES (15 facilities, chain avg rating 4.3★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$13,065
Fines, last 3 years
3.20
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 15, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 15, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 15, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely.
May 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Sep 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
Sep 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Sep 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Sep 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Sep 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340D
202460D
202570D
202611G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $13,065.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 15, 2026Fine$13,065

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNevada avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.204.053.95bottom 11% in Nevada; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.820.980.69bottom 41% in Nevada; top 26% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.823.613.50bottom 14% in Nevada; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.790.870.48top 37% in Nevada; top 12% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)39.545.145.8top 33% in Nevada; top 35% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)27.643.442.9top 23% in Nevada; top 25% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.12, RN 1.05, weekend 3.64. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Fogg, PhillipIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%06/22/2012
Marquis Companies I, INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%09/01/2019
Fogg, PhillipIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE06/22/2012
Fogg, PhillipIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/22/2012
Fogg, PhillipIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/22/2012
Fogg, PhillipIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2019
Fogg, StevenIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2019
Fogg, StevenIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/22/2012
Fogg, StevenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Meyer, LisaIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE08/16/2019
Meyer, LisaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/16/2019
Sprando, ErinIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Sprando, ErinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2019
Tone, StaciIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE06/22/2012
Tone, StaciIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
El Jen Skilled Care1.0 miLas Vegas, NV★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Advanced Health Care of Summerlin1.2 miLas Vegas, NV★★★★☆3/5
Neurorestorative1.7 miLas Vegas, NV★★★★★5/5
Silver Hills Health Care Center1.7 miLas Vegas, NV★★☆☆☆2/5
Life Care Center of Las Vegas2.0 miLas Vegas, NV★★★☆☆3/5
Royal Springs Healthcare and Rehab2.8 miLas Vegas, NV★☆☆☆☆2/5
Neurorestorative3.1 miLas Vegas, NV★★★★★5/5
Silver Ridge Healthcare Center4.1 miLas Vegas, NV★★★★☆3/5
Torrey Pines Post Acute and Rehabilitation4.5 miLas Vegas, NV★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Horizon Health and Rehabilitation Center4.8 miLas Vegas, NV★★☆☆☆2/5
Silver State Pediatric Skilled Nursing Facility4.9 miLas Vegas, NV★★★★★4/5
Saint Joseph Transitional Rehabilitation Center5.2 miLas Vegas, NV★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Las Vegas →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 295070.