NevadaLas Vegas

Marquis Care at Centennial Hills

6351 N Fort Apache Rd, Las Vegas, NV 89149 · Clark County · 120 certified beds · avg 96 residents/day · certified since Nov 9, 2010

Part of chain: MARQUIS COMPANIES (15 facilities, chain avg rating 4.3★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.58
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (26)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jun 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jun 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jun 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jun 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. · from a complaint
Feb 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Feb 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · from a complaint
Jul 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Jul 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jul 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jul 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jul 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jul 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jul 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jul 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Jul 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Jul 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jul 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Jul 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jul 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jul 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Jul 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Jul 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202370D
2024110D
202580D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNevada avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.584.053.95bottom 35% in Nevada; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.870.980.69top 48% in Nevada; top 23% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.303.613.50bottom 41% in Nevada; bottom 47% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.940.870.48top 30% in Nevada; top 7% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)29.545.145.8top 10% in Nevada; top 13% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)20.843.442.9top 7% in Nevada; top 16% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.70, RN 1.14, weekend 4.33. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Fogg, PhillipIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest08/16/2010
Marquis Companies I, INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%11/10/2010
Atwood, JacobIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE04/06/2018
Atwood, JacobIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/06/2018
Fogg, PhillipIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE08/16/2010
Fogg, PhillipIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/16/2010
Fogg, StevenIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE08/16/2010
Fogg, StevenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/16/2010
Sprando, ErinIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE06/10/2015
Sprando, ErinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/10/2015
Tone, StaciIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE08/16/2010

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Trellis Centennial0.6 miLas Vegas, NV★★★★★4/5
Skye Canyon Post Acute1.2 miLas Vegas, NV★★★★★5/5
Silver Hills Health Care Center4.3 miLas Vegas, NV★★☆☆☆2/5
Neurorestorative4.4 miLas Vegas, NV★★★★★5/5
Royal Springs Healthcare and Rehab4.7 miLas Vegas, NV★☆☆☆☆2/5
Advanced Health Care of Summerlin5.3 miLas Vegas, NV★★★★☆3/5
El Jen Skilled Care5.5 miLas Vegas, NV★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Marquis Plaza Regency Post Acute Rehab5.7 miLas Vegas, NV★★★★☆4/5
Neurorestorative6.5 miLas Vegas, NV★★★★★5/5
Life Care Center of Las Vegas7.2 miLas Vegas, NV★★★☆☆3/5
The Heights of Summerlin, LLC8.1 miLas Vegas, NV★★☆☆☆2/5
Las Ventanas Retirement Comm SNF8.2 miLas Vegas, NV★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Las Vegas →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 295089.